Sun and Moon #rules-questions

May 2024

Messages from the Sun and Moon #rules-questions Discord channel, copied for Oracle of the Void. Players' names are left out; the rules officials are named. Rulings are as they stood on these dates; later rulings and the rulebooks may differ.

A player, 1 May 2024 17:57

Question- in Legacy

Akodo- does his battle action to put him into play require you to meet his Honor requirement?

Answers on: Akodo
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 1 May 2024 17:58 · in reply

Yes.

A player, 3 May 2024 22:50

Is a shadowlands horde player allowed to play suspicions?

Or does that violate the clause on their stronghold that prevents them from taking actions that cause other players unconditional honor loss?

Suspicions is an event, though I suspect that doesn't make it okay, because I'm pretty sure I've got the wording on some of that wrong.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 3 May 2024 22:54
[attachment: image.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 3 May 2024 22:55

Suspicions isn't action

A player, 3 May 2024 23:14

Siege question- the Rokugani players' honor gains in Clan Wars are replaced by gaining Political Tokens. This means your family honor never increases- how do you meet Honor Requirements?

A player, 3 May 2024 23:14
[attachment: Screenshot_20240503_155528_Moon_Reader.jpg]
A player, 3 May 2024 23:17

Or, for that matter, recover lost honor?

A player, 3 May 2024 23:43 · in reply

Thanks!

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 3 May 2024 23:51 · in reply

(link)

A player, 3 May 2024 23:52

I have been blind and a fool.

A player, 3 May 2024 23:52

Tha k you kindly lol

A player, 4 May 2024 06:50

hey, I have a question. This has probably been answered a thousand times... but I figure I should verify how this interaction works. I'm doing this for my JadeEx box I'm running for KublaCon, and feel like I should know pretty well how it interacts.

So, if I have the ring of air in play, and I play two actions on kihos, shugenjas, or spells, and Then play Finding the Harmony to swap the Ring of Air for a different Ring, can I then immediately play the Ring of Air as I have now satisfied the conditions for playing it?

[attachment: printing_2555_2_details.jpg] [attachment: printing_6333_9_details.jpg]
A player, 4 May 2024 06:51

furthermore, if I do this a second time, are the conditions still met? If I miss the trigger to play it after a kiho, can I play it later in the same turn?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 10:18

Yes, FETA was a "cheese" deck in Jade (pun intended) which stood for "Finding Enlightenment Through Air". You could do all of that except the last thing. You have to React with Air right after taking the 3rd (or later) Spell/Kiho action; you can't wait and do it anytime later in the turn.

A player, 4 May 2024 11:19

Thanks! I'll have to do some playtesting to find out just how crazy broken it is compared to other decks. If it's too much, I will retool it into a more traditional phoenix kiho/spell slinger deck so as not to spoil the engagement.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 11:26 · in reply

I can't remember if Finding the Harmony actually got a mid-Arc errata to fix it because it was so broken, or if it didn't get "fixed" until its Gold Edition MRP. That info might be in here: (link) But I'm too lazy to check myself. πŸ˜›

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 4 May 2024 11:29

pretty sure it remained broken until Gold; actual errata that didn't come via MRP was scarce in the Old Times

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 4 May 2024 11:30

Turblightenment also lost to Monk Military in the Monk vs. Monk GenCon finals

A player, 4 May 2024 12:59

Was the closest enlightenment got to winning Gencon

A player, 4 May 2024 13:00

And it lost to monk military lol

A player, 4 May 2024 13:00

But as I remember, that monk deck was not feta. Because that was the Gencon where Honor Bound released at the convention?

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 4 May 2024 13:08

it wasn't, it was the 1999 War in the Heavens finals

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 4 May 2024 13:08

but I misremembered my own reporting from that event because it was legit "starts Water" House of Tao Turblightenment https://kolatinformant.wordpress.com/2014/05/25/1999-war-in-the-heavens/#more-1430

[1999 War in the Heavens]
A player, 4 May 2024 13:09

That was an impressive deck.

A player, 4 May 2024 13:09

But I was curious.. moving convo to jade

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 4 May 2024 13:09

watching it in action was a thing of beauty

A player, 4 May 2024 16:27

Im sure this has already been asked, but he can't overlay onto the Danna-Sama item right?

[attachment: image.png]
Answers on: Danna-sama
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 16:29 · in reply

Only Personalities can overlay or be overlaid.

A player, 4 May 2024 16:31

Yeah I thought so, but the rules have a statement indicating that exp items cant overlay, but it doesn't talk about personalities onto items

A player, 4 May 2024 16:34
[attachment: image.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 16:43

Ah, I see; a bit of an overlooked a technical gap in the wording there. That statement is meant to work both ways. To fall back on previous precedent, Kanpeki could not/cannot overlay his Holding version either.

A player, 4 May 2024 16:44

Thank you.

A player, 4 May 2024 17:41

Does a wind remove the ability to lobby for the imperial favour or does it give you an additional option to get the imperial favour in the method ducted on the card ?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 17:47 · in reply

You can still Lobby normally. But you can only Lobby once per turn, no matter what Lobby action you choose to use.

A player, 4 May 2024 17:48

Ah okay is it the same for using the favour you can use it for the normal favour actions or the ones written in your wind ?

A player, 4 May 2024 17:48

I thought it was instead of this whole time πŸ˜…

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 17:49 · in reply

The Favor actions are instead, just the Lobby isn't. So, if you have a Wind, you can't use the Rulebook Favor abilities.

A player, 4 May 2024 17:49

Ooooohhh okay so you can get the favour via lobbying or the wind but using it you can only use it for the winds effects ?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 May 2024 17:51

Yep

A player, 5 May 2024 18:00

If the Attacker wins, he or she destroys all units in the defending army. If the attacking army’s Force was greater than the defending army’s Force plus the Province Strength of the battle

eld’s Province, the Attacker also destroys the Province.

this is going to sound bloody stupid but i have always played it in a way where hou must meet or exceed the province strength so say they are at 9 strength and you have 9 force in your army you would win that battle

can i just get confirmation it would have to be at 10 force not 9 in order to takew the province

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 5 May 2024 18:01

9 PS must have a minimum 10F army attacking it (with no defense, of course) to be destroyed.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 5 May 2024 18:02

I had the opposite problem with SmashUp. Because of years of playing L5R, I thought you had to exceed a Base's breakpoint to score it, but in SmashUp, you just have to meet it. πŸ˜›

A player, 5 May 2024 19:22

i think ffgl5r was meet the province strength too..

A player, 5 May 2024 22:21 · in reply

Okay then... If it's your turn, and you use this guy to lobby for the favor with his own action, can you then later lobby using the rulebook action? He explicitly ignores the lobby once per turn rule, but the wording seems to imply that if you use him first it still takes your once per turn lobby.

[attachment: image0.jpg]
A player, 5 May 2024 22:23

The Oracle text is also a little oddly worded... "Limited: Even if you have already Lobbied this turn, if you have only done so once before, bow Ichiro: He Lobbies, ignoring the cost of bowing."

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 5 May 2024 22:23

It's more based on his CWS MRP.

A player, 5 May 2024 22:24

Alright.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 5 May 2024 22:24

But yes, if you Lobby with his ability first, that's your one Lobby, you're done. You have to use the normal one first.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 5 May 2024 22:25

Also, his weird wording means you have to use his SECOND, if you have 3+ ways to Lobby. He will not let you do it a third or later time, if you already did twice some other way.

A player, 5 May 2024 22:25

That can be awkward sometimes, but it's good to know that's how it works.

I think my Jade decks no longer use him, I think I switched over to Yoshi (and his Soul-Of), but he'd be a good swap due to his cost.

A player, 5 May 2024 22:26

Yoshi is, of course, much more flexible.

A player, 5 May 2024 22:26

Yoshi's action is Open. It's always more flexible.

saaam (not official), 5 May 2024 22:53

Side note, Ichiro Exp is one buff dude. Not just for a Courtier. He's more buff than most Crane Samurai.

A player, 5 May 2024 23:29

Toshimoko's son

A player, 5 May 2024 23:30

So you know. "The seed is strong."

A player, 6 May 2024 11:53

Ok, this might be seen as a weird question at this point in time, but could anybody please explain to me the difference between LCG and CCG? Up to this day that is something that is still not 100% clear to me. Thanks a lot in advance...

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 May 2024 11:56 · in reply

My understanding is that generally, the Living Card Game (LCG) model puts out its sets in fixed packages that include known quantities of all cards. CCGs (Collectible Card Games) distribute primarily in randomized packs with varied rarities. And that's what I take to be the main difference. If you're asking specifically about the differences between the 2 L5R versions, Tetsuro goes into greater detail below.

Jeremy Sumerlin (rules official), 6 May 2024 12:06

History wise, the CCG was the original game and setting, which existed from 1995 to 2015, when the IP was sold to FFG.

FFG reimagined the game setting, discarding almost all story elements and developments since the CCG's very first release, Imperial Edition, effectively rebooting the franchise and retelling the first storyline, with several of those characters re-imagined or replaced. The game folded and was discontinued I believe towards the end of that first arc, roughly analogous to the Time of the Void CCG expansion.

Currently FFG appears to be re-reimagining the setting and story again for future projects. It is unclear if this would be a follow up to their first reboot attempt that was the LCG

Mechanically, a CCG uses the old Common/Uncommon/Rare distribution model of games like Magic, with randomized booster packs and fixed starter decks.

LCGs use a fixed system with no rarity, where one receives the entire set at once in an expansion pack, and there are no boosters. The argument is that this is more affordable for players, though this is sometimes countered by the need to buy multiple copies of an expansion pack to get as many copies as needed of critical cards for multiple decks.

Gameplay wise, the LCG adopts some of the recognized tropes of the CCG, such as the two deck system, but discards many others in favor of new mechanics or mechanics heavily inspired by their other games, particularly the Game of Thrones LCG

Jeremy Sumerlin (rules official), 6 May 2024 12:09

There are far too many differences in mechanics from the CCG to the LCG to cover them all, and as I'm not totally versed in all the rules that eventually became a part of the LCG, I'd probably get several of them wrong. πŸ™‚

A player, 6 May 2024 12:16

Also, while "LCG" is a term specifically owned by FFG, other companies have made their own LCGs (also, strictly speaking, a board game like Munchkin is a living card game as well). FFG also puts out various co-operative living card games (like the Arkhan Horror card game) which do way better than competitive LCGs (and in both cases, as a business model they are much cheaper to produce and logistically easier to maintain than a "regular" CCG)

A player, 6 May 2024 12:21

Ironically, due to the digital nature of the game currently, the Onyx content, being a "fixed rarity" style set, is more analogous to the LCG distribution style (where no one has to chase rare cards).

kempy_nezumi (not official), 6 May 2024 12:21

L5R LCG by nature are also "slower" than CCG. Instead iof 160 cards per 3 months you got like 20 cards per month (as average) so in tribalised game like L5R yiur clan evolves so slow (its hard to mix cards between clans as they are clan locked). LCG by averwge requires 1.5 year to get viable number of cards to make some deckbuilding ideas. In a world of internet in such small cardpool meta is explored really fast.

A player, 6 May 2024 12:22

If you want to learn more about the LCG though let me know. I played it from start to end of official support

A player, 6 May 2024 12:24

Thanks to you all for your help. I think I finally have a clear picture (at least it is clearer than before) of both systems. Thanks a lot!!!!!

A player, 6 May 2024 18:38

Also, overall player cost wise. LCG is hell of a lot cheaper then the CCG model.

A player, 7 May 2024 00:28

Nitoshi's Gift-

Does this effect trigger if a personality is forcibly moved to a battlefield by someone other than the target's controller?

[attachment: image-18.png]
Answers on: Nitoshi's Gift
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 7 May 2024 00:30 · in reply

No. Their controller has to be the one moving them.

A player, 7 May 2024 00:30

Thanks

A player, 7 May 2024 09:18

I want to double-check something... can I stop Kisada's Funeral from entering in play with Meditating Mind? (Assuming the opponent is using Kano's Alliance as his Wind)

A player, 7 May 2024 09:52 · in reply

pretty sure you can't

A player, 7 May 2024 09:58 · in reply

if they are useing kano, the dynasty action to put the event into play cannot be negated by meditating mind. if they are windless or have another wind, you can cnegate the dynasty action preventing the card from entering play

A player, 7 May 2024 10:09

Thanks!

A player, 7 May 2024 15:52 · in reply
[attachment: ROU_002.png]
A player, 7 May 2024 21:39

I have a question about Personal Assassin from Chaos Reigns: The assassin targets with its engage action so does the target immediately get a poison token even at the engage step?

Answers on: Personal Assassin
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 7 May 2024 21:45 · in reply

No. It was targeted during the first effect removing its abilities. The indefinite conditional effect set up afterwards will trigger on each subsequent targeting, but the action's own targeting has already passed and will not trigger it.

A player, 8 May 2024 07:20 · in reply

Thanks! much appreciated.

A player, 8 May 2024 12:37

Does this card affect force tokens?

[attachment: Captura.JPG]
A player, 8 May 2024 12:39

Tokens are not bonuses, they provide modifiers (like items)

A player, 8 May 2024 12:39

As I thought, just wanted to double-check. Thanks

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:44 · in reply

No, sorry. The opposite is true. Tokens give bonuses and penalties. CR page 95 and 96.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:44 · in reply

See above

A player, 8 May 2024 12:45

Whaaaattttt?????

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:45

assuming the card holding the tokens is still there at the end of the turn, however, the rejection of conflict will expire and the bonuses or penalties will return then

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:46 · in reply

As well as any other bonuses or penalties with a duration longer than the negation duration.

A player, 8 May 2024 12:48 · in reply

Ok, that means that this card can also remove penalties from force tokens, right?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:49 · in reply

Until the end of turn, after which they would reassert. But yes.

A player, 8 May 2024 12:49

Wow...

A player, 8 May 2024 12:54

Huh

Answers on: Reject Conflict
A player, 8 May 2024 12:54

Thats...not intuitive.

A player, 8 May 2024 12:55

"A ninja poisoned my lunch, but I reject conflict so I'll be fine" lol

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:56

wouldn't say fine exactly, the Chi penalties will still be there

A player, 8 May 2024 12:56

Eh they're like Hit Points. As long as you're above 0 there's no issue πŸ˜‰

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 8 May 2024 12:57

removing the symptoms but masking that severe internal hemorrhaging

Jeremy Sumerlin (rules official), 8 May 2024 13:47 · in reply

Someone went to the Burning Sands School of Knife Fighting

A player, 8 May 2024 14:54

the distinction between modifiers and bonuses/penalties was also confusing to me. The easiest way to remember is that only Items and Senseis give modifiers, everything else gives bonuses and/or penalties (I hope I'm not wrong πŸ˜… )

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 May 2024 19:11

If you are second in OBH, and you face this guy, it means youre dead as you literally can't announce any action, including Dynasty Recruit?

[attachment: image0.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 19:12 · in reply

Hrm. Good point. If your opponent gets this guy out and you have no Personalities, you can't do anything in a post Ivory Ruleset.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 19:13

Except maybe fish and pray for Unexpected Allies or similar.

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 8 May 2024 19:37

FOYK stock just went up

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 19:47 · in reply

Nah. Fall won't stop Sugi locking out your Dynasty.

A player, 8 May 2024 21:53

Once per turn. So the recourse here is to build up enough gold to buy two personalities

A player, 8 May 2024 21:54

And either the first gets canceled from the ability, or it goes through and the person can pay the cost.

A player, 8 May 2024 21:54

It's precious momentum, but thats the name of the game in OBH

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 21:55 · in reply

But how do you buy Gold in the first place?

A player, 8 May 2024 21:55

Same deal. Since you have BK and if second BH, you can take more than one action

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 21:56

Ah, sure. I mean, it's a fairly unlikely hypothetical anyway.

A player, 8 May 2024 21:57

Yeah. Don't get me wrong, it's pretty strong jank, but IMHO obh is a duel of "may the best jank win"

A player, 8 May 2024 22:41

Hello guys, question with Isawa, he says he will cast spells in hand as if they were attached to him. If its attached to him it means I already paid for the spell. So am I able to use the spells for free or I need to pay to use it?

[attachment: printing_3814_1_details.png]
Answers on: Isawa
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 22:59 · in reply

No Gold needed. Have fun. πŸ™‚

saaam (not official), 8 May 2024 23:00

Hmm. Would he get the -1C Corruption Tokens if he cast something like The Wasting Disease?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 8 May 2024 23:08 · in reply

No. "Casting" a Spell only involves taking its action; their traits won't factor in from your hand.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 9 May 2024 05:57 · in reply

But it's only once per turn Reaction "after an action is announced". So what's exactly happening? Player announces Recruit without any unbowed Personalities in play. Then Sugimoto player uses his Reaction. Action failed, becasue there's no way to pay costs. So player still may announce another Recruit?

A player, 9 May 2024 09:50

Quick question: When a card grants you a lobby bonus or inflict the opponent a lobby penalty, that does apply only to the rulebook lobby mechanics? Or that also applies to the wind's mechanics for taking the imperial favor?

A player, 9 May 2024 09:53

It applies to any of the lobby methods

A player, 9 May 2024 09:55

Meaning if for example you have an empty hand, lobby bonus of 10, and your opponent with Suikihime has a full hand, then they cannot wind lobby

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 May 2024 09:59 · in reply

Yeah, I suppose it's "action", not "ability", so one could just try Recruiting again? Unless it didn't mean that in Lotus.... Ah well, it was a just a fun thought exercise for an unlikely circumstance anyway. πŸ˜›

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 May 2024 10:02 · in reply

Yeah, Marcus is correct. When Winds were made, the definition of Lobby Bonus was amended to be broader. Fun fact: There technically is no definition for Lobby Penalty, so that's being introduced now and the Rule will need further amending.

A player, 9 May 2024 16:55

an ability that has "Dynasty: ..." can that be only done on your own dynasty, or can it be done each dynasty?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 May 2024 16:57 · in reply

Only your own.

A player, 9 May 2024 16:59

Thanks. Is that in the comprehensive rules somewhere? or the onyx rules? I know I saw proclaiming, but wasn't sure about this specifically.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 May 2024 17:01 · in reply

It's in the 20F CR somewhere. I don't have it handy, but I think there's an overview of phases, and while Action Phase says "everybody takes turns taking actions", Dynasty says "just you take actions". Something like that.

A player, 9 May 2024 17:03

thanks

A player, 9 May 2024 17:05 · in reply

(link)

A player, 9 May 2024 17:05

Kempy posted the spesific wording from the comprehensive rulebook a little while ago πŸ™‚

A player, 9 May 2024 17:05

Thanks

A player, 9 May 2024 19:08

so in ShE, does silk merchant and majordomo combo how I think it does?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 May 2024 19:14 · in reply

Do you mean Fine Silk Merchant, and what exactly are you thinking?

A player, 9 May 2024 19:20

Each time you use Majordomo, FSM gets +1GP until end of turn. That means, if you've got 2 FSMs, each use of Majordomo pays for itself, and if you have all 3, each use of Majordomo nets you 1GP profit

A player, 9 May 2024 19:23

sorry thought i could post the rest, then game started

A player, 9 May 2024 19:23

hold on

A player, 9 May 2024 19:29 · in reply

ah that is what I thought

A player, 9 May 2024 19:29

had 5 retainers, 3 of which were silk merchants

A player, 9 May 2024 19:30

it got a bit silly

A player, 9 May 2024 19:33

question with this card Otomo Lineage. Can I target one of my personalities in provinces for the +1PH? or it has to be in play?

[attachment: printing_5816_1_details.png]
Answers on: Otomo Lineage
kempy_nezumi (not official), 9 May 2024 19:50

You can't target card out of play unless card allows it.

A player, 9 May 2024 20:02

For the Onyx edition Spider stronghold, does the Fear effect trigger if you target a personality that already has Shadowlands?

kempy_nezumi (not official), 9 May 2024 20:04

y

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 May 2024 20:18 · in reply

I hope Kempy above is ok? I think his "y" was meant to be an affirmative reply to your question. The answer is "yes, as long as they're yours, it doesn't matter if the target already has Shadowlands or not."

kempy_nezumi (not official), 9 May 2024 20:21

as long as they're yours and it's as Battle

A player, 9 May 2024 20:21

Thanks

A player, 9 May 2024 21:34

Are you able to use an all clan sensei, if you use a stronghold without clan? Like Lost traveler castle

kempy_nezumi (not official), 10 May 2024 04:31

Yes

A player, 10 May 2024 06:27

For the terrain Fields of Slaughter, would honor be gained for using Rout?

kempy_nezumi (not official), 10 May 2024 08:44

For LE printing of Field and Celestial Rout - no. As theres movement first and destroying attachment happens during battle but not at battlefield.

A player, 10 May 2024 09:45

Is the Strongholds trait a bonus for Saiyuki when beeing opposed ? I am asking because in the 20F-Rulebook about "BONUSES AND PENALTIES" it says about exceptions to a bonus or penalty: # 0.5. A fluctuating bonus or penalty is one that explicitly changes with the game state. Example: A card that has +1F for each Samurai in play. Changes in the size of a fluctuating bonus or penalty due to changes in the game state are not bonuses or penalties. Example: A card that has +1F for each Samurai in play goes from +3F to +2F when a Samurai is destroyed. This is not a Force penalty. #

A player, 10 May 2024 09:49

The Questions Is about "The Impregnable Fortress of the Crab" Stronghold and "Hida Saiyuki ". I cannot upload the card images to show them here, don't know why.

A player, 10 May 2024 09:51

Don't see any Upload button.

A player, 10 May 2024 10:11

I think image uploads might be tied to format roles, you only have a tourney role

A player, 10 May 2024 10:21

You might be right, i forgot about that when i entered this server. Thanks i will catch up on it asap...

A player, 10 May 2024 10:42

Roles are handed out manually so you'll still have to wait a bit

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 10 May 2024 13:35 · in reply

Saiyuki gets the extra +1F while opposed. One of my tournament wins was an Ivory Strict format just before 20F legality and the stronghold cycled out, with cheap bodies, force bonuses and penalties, and card draw. It was designed to maximize Saiyuki.

[attachment: printing_11148_1_details.png] [attachment: printing_11290_1_details.png]
A player, 10 May 2024 14:10

So every different force bonus would give him +1F? And the difference to the example in the rulebook compared to this one is that being opposed is a true/false state condition which does not scale ? When the trait on the Stronghold would read "... +1F for every opposing Personality" then it would not give him the bonus at all because it would be similar to the example in the rulebook ?

A player, 10 May 2024 14:12

Maybe i am reading the example with the Samurai wrong πŸ˜…

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 10 May 2024 14:13

so the text you quoted from the rulebook involves when the "fluctuating bonus" changes -- using Saiyuki as an example, he is in an opposed battle, therefore he has a +2F bonus, but if for some reason the opposition is removed, his Force drops by 2 as the bonus no longer applies, but that Force drop is not considered a Force penalty

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 10 May 2024 14:14

the initial bonus (even if fluctuating) is still a bonus

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 10 May 2024 14:15

and if he harpoons back in a new opposition, he will receive the +2F as a new bonus

A player, 10 May 2024 14:16

Really? I'd have thought it's not a new bonus, but the same bonus that reapplies itself (the previous state of "opposed" is once more true)

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 10 May 2024 14:20

In terms of where that mechanically makes a difference I'd defer to @Brook Cunningham, but as a hypothetical

If there was a card in play with a trait that said Negate the first Force bonus a Personality receives at this battle and you start the battle with Saiyuki opposed, his initial +2F would be negated. Changing the state to unopposed would remove the condition of that initial bonus, but then recreating the opposition later would reapply the conditions and create a new bonus, not just generate the "same" bonus to be reapplied as already negated.

(please Brook tell me if I'm totally off base here)

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 10 May 2024 14:24 · in reply

You might be? But it's a rare enough case, I'd have to check the CR, which I don't have handy.

A player, 10 May 2024 16:03

question, when using this stronghold Palace of the Breking down, would Honored sensei still produce 1 more gold and gain 1 honor if I pay for an uniligned personality or any clan personality? I think not but still want to make sure

[attachment: printing_5863_1_details.png] [attachment: printing_3440_3_details.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 10 May 2024 16:19 · in reply

yes

A player, 10 May 2024 16:25 · in reply

thanks, didn't though it would apply if you didn't had a faction, but nice to know it does

A player, 10 May 2024 17:20

Unicorn rule question: Can "Utaku Kimionos" response ability be used with traits from "Moto Ajinai", "Moto Nergui" or "Moto Maral" ? Or can it only be used with Actions that give tokens?

A player, 10 May 2024 17:21

Any Response can only be used in response to an Action. Traits are very notably not Actions

A player, 10 May 2024 17:24

Ok. That makes the card less good as i first thought, but still ok πŸ˜€...

A player, 10 May 2024 17:36 · in reply

if it helps to remmeber, an Unaligned player does not share a clan alignment with Unaligned personalities

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 10 May 2024 22:33 · in reply

Also a player and a player: Doc is correct. Emphasis mine below: "CONTINUOUS # Finally, non-triggered traits like β€œYour Samurai have +1F” have continuous effects that apply while the card is in play and all conditions on the trait, if any, are met (see Traits, previous section). If a continuous effect ceases to apply, then is reapplied, it is a new effect; for example, a Force bonus that was negated by an ongoing effect will reassert itself." From the CR page 40.

A player, 11 May 2024 17:14

Can you range attack nothing? Like... lets say I have a range 3, can I activate the ability without a target at the battlefield? I am asking because "No Hiding Place" indicates that it's an interrupt to the action.

Answers on: No Hiding Place
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 17:16 · in reply

No, there is required targeting for RAs. However, in specific reference to your NHP example, actions can be announced and targets can be chosen legally in their respective steps based on later actions/choices that you may take, and if you do so, you must take them/be able to take them.

A player, 11 May 2024 17:18

That... confused me

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 17:19

I added a few words in editing. Does it still? If so, which part?

A player, 11 May 2024 17:19

Yes, how can it interrupt something that can't be initiated?

A player, 11 May 2024 17:20

I know that it changes the target and therefore makes it targetable, but how can you even go to activate it without opposition?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 17:26 · in reply

You can initiate it. Note the final paragraph of the Good Faith Rule, 20F CR pg 37:

"The Good Faith rule takes into account future changes in the game state that are known to the player. Example: if Bob plans to play an Interrupt that gives the action a target it wouldn’t have when he announced it, this allows him to play the action, but also requires him to play that Interrupt having announced it."

A player, 11 May 2024 17:26

ok, thank you!

Answers on: No Hiding Place
A player, 11 May 2024 17:26

I had included no hiding place with this idea in mind, but then read it as an interrupt and was like... waaaait a second lol

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 17:28

All that said, my ancient memory stirs that there may have been past Editions where in the Rules, RA targeting was not required, but that way lies madness.

A player, 11 May 2024 17:28

Praise P'an Ku. The Madness Spreads.

A player, 11 May 2024 17:28

OMG that's mind blowing for me... I thought No Hiding Place was nasty, but that card is hell itself

saaam (not official), 11 May 2024 17:31

No, RAs were always required to be targetted to be played.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 17:36 · in reply

I choose to believe you are correct for my sanity. πŸ™‚

A player, 11 May 2024 20:32 · in reply

Ok, but right now, RAs do require a target or not?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 20:39 · in reply

Yes, in 20F/Onyx, they absolutely do.

A player, 11 May 2024 20:54 · in reply

Buuuuu, but ok, got it xD

A player, 11 May 2024 22:13

House of Tsukihime targeting a province in my province vs. a Raid Battle opponent... what is this interaction?

A player, 11 May 2024 22:15

So far I know, the raids don't happen in a province, so that wind should not interact with them

A player, 11 May 2024 22:15

the wind doesnt care

kempy_nezumi (not official), 11 May 2024 22:29 · in reply
[attachment: image.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 22:44 · in reply

A Raid battle will "use up" the triggered effect of HoT Wind to no effect. A Raid Attack is a declared attack, the player "must" assign a Personality somewhere that doesn't exist (assuming it's the usual sort of Raid; 1 battle at no Province), so they are not obligated to do anything.

A player, 11 May 2024 22:46

Ok thank you!

A player, 11 May 2024 22:57

Another Raid question:

In the case of a tie for a regular battle: "If the battle is tied and there are one or more units on both sides of the battlefield, the Attacker and Defender each destroy all units in the enemy army."

And in the rules for Raid battles: "[its] resolution does not destroy defending armies and cannot destroy Provinces"

Does this mean by extension that if you trigger a Raid battle and tie, your units are destroyed but the defender's are not?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 23:04 · in reply

Correct.

A player, 11 May 2024 23:45

Thank you!

A player, 11 May 2024 23:46

does Determination count as giving a card Unstoppable?

Would a card that prevents cards from having Unstoppable stop Determination from working?

Answers on: Determination
A player, 11 May 2024 23:47
[attachment: printing_1985_1_details.jpg] [attachment: printing_12639_1_details.jpg]
A player, 11 May 2024 23:48

MRP text on Oracle doesn't explicitly make it Unstoppable, but that seems to be the effect of the card.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 23:48

1. No 2. No.

A player, 11 May 2024 23:48

alright.

A player, 11 May 2024 23:48

thanks

A player, 11 May 2024 23:48

also... am I allowed to use Fu-Leng, the Ninth Kami in BigDeck?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 23:49 · in reply

You will note, the rest of Fu Leng's trait also stops Determination, regardless of the fact it has nothing to do with "Unstoppable".

A player, 11 May 2024 23:50

I didn't actually notice that... I'm kinda just understanding these cards for the first time here. I picked up the Clan War Siege box ages ago, but never had anyone to play it with.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 11 May 2024 23:52

I think someone already answered in the Big Deck Discord that Fu Leng is indeed useable in the format (yikes :P).

A player, 12 May 2024 02:41

With Obsidian Halls of the lost: My opponent can't choose to give their character Shadowlands if their character already has Shadowlands, correct? I feel like I remember that being a thing, but I'm also not sure I could articulate why it's a thing...

A player, 12 May 2024 02:46

In the LCG you're not allowed to choose an effect that would result in no game state change. But I don't think that rule exists in the CCG. You're allowed to choose to dishonor a personality who's already dishonored, for instance.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 02:46 · in reply

No, your opponent can totally choose to give them Shadowlands even if they already have it. You can't just nuke tainted people's Chi with the box; you'll need other ways to make it a bad choice.

A player, 12 May 2024 02:46

Alright. Good to know πŸ™‚ thanks!

A player, 12 May 2024 19:23

Are Reactions once per MY turn or once per turn (also during my opponents turn) in general? So could i use a Reaction ability on a card in play during my turn and during the opponents turn?

A player, 12 May 2024 19:26

Abilities (identified by having a bolded timing keyword) can be used once per turn. Your turn and an opponent's turn count as separate turns.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 19:28 · in reply

Andrew is correct. πŸ™‚

A player, 12 May 2024 20:17

Is the personality created by the supposed to have a gold cost or no?

[attachment: image.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 20:18 · in reply

By default, it has a GC stat of 0.

A player, 12 May 2024 20:18

Ok, usually they have whatever you paid, thats why I wasn't sure.

A player, 12 May 2024 21:46

can you overlay in lotus if you dont meet the honor req.?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 21:57 · in reply

I'm pretty sure the HR waiving was the same throughout all Editions, but I don't have the Lotus Rulebook handy to check.

A player, 12 May 2024 22:36

I checked the rule book and it didn't say either way.

A player, 12 May 2024 23:14

Can you cycle without moving any cards to the bottom of the deck? like... just cycle a face down?

A player, 12 May 2024 23:15 · in reply

i believe so, the action itself is put 0-4 card on the bottom of your deck and then refil all provinces face up if i recall

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:16 · in reply

In 20F/Onyx CR it's not 0-4, it's one or more.

A player, 12 May 2024 23:16

i was incorrect it is 1 or more

A player, 12 May 2024 23:16

But, can the 1 be the facedown card?

A player, 12 May 2024 23:16

or you have to move at least 1

A player, 12 May 2024 23:16

that is face up?

A player, 12 May 2024 23:16
[attachment: image.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:17 · in reply

However! Yes, if all of your cards are face-down, you can still use Cycle to turn them all up. Unlikely, but possible.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:17

The first two effects just don't happen in that case.

A player, 12 May 2024 23:18

ok but if you have at least 1 face up you have to move at least 1 to cycle at all

A player, 12 May 2024 23:18

thanks

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:18

Or rather, the choice and the bottoming; the choice isn't technically an "effect".

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:18 · in reply

Correct. (Sorry, I misread at first.)

A player, 12 May 2024 23:18

yeah i thought the two were connected but there is a full stop so they are two seperate effects

A player, 12 May 2024 23:19

or does the then clause force you to do the first half first?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:20 · in reply

As Nue said, if there are any face-up cards, the first sentence will force you to choose at least one, and the second sentence will bottom it. But if they're all face-down, you just skip the choosing and bottoming and WHOOSH, all face-up.

A player, 12 May 2024 23:21 · in reply

while agree you are almost certainly correct shouldn't there be an 'if able'?

A player, 12 May 2024 23:22 · in reply

To make things clear... if there's exactly 1 face up card, you have to move that one to the bottom of the deck, then you refill that province, then you are able to flip the four cards face up?

A player, 12 May 2024 23:22

If there are two face up cards... can you move one of them to the bottom of the deck, refill that province and then flip face up the three face down cards?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:23 · in reply

It would just be reminder, which isn't required game text.

A player, 12 May 2024 23:23 · in reply

that makes sense

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:23 · in reply

Yes.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:23 · in reply

Yep.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 May 2024 23:27 · in reply

It says in a roundabout way. The Lotus rulebook says you ignore the card's "play restrictions" and earlier in the book, HR is described as a "restriction".

A player, 12 May 2024 23:34

Good enough for me.

A player, 13 May 2024 06:39

One question about Interrupt effects. Can you use them once per trigger per turn or only once per turn at all?

kempy_nezumi (not official), 13 May 2024 07:31

Unless they are Repeatable they follow standard OPT (once per turn).

A player, 16 May 2024 20:13

I see a lot of decks running only 1 Forgotten Legacy. Is there a reason for this? It isn't Unique and from what I can tell the Legacy Dynasty action isn't once per game.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 16 May 2024 20:15

One copy is enough to avoid total goldscrew during most important first turn. Later this card might be clunky as it's 3 for 3 and that may be problematic in 4GP Strongholds.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 16 May 2024 20:17

Also cost of a removing Fate card is not something you want to pay 3 times, turn by turn.

A player, 16 May 2024 21:01

Makes sense, thanks.

A player, 17 May 2024 01:45

Hello guys, question. Are guys like chukage able to put false rings or dark rings into play? or only normal ones? Under legacy or big Deck construction I mean

[attachment: printing_533_1_details.png]
A player, 17 May 2024 01:47

this is another example

[attachment: printing_9104_1_details.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 17 May 2024 01:54 · in reply

"Ring of Water" is a specific card title. Those two can only get the normal one. Chukage is worded a bit misleadingly, as his trait says "a" Ring of Water, but there is only one.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 17 May 2024 01:55

It would be a different situation if either said a "Water Ring". Then it could be any Ring with the Water keyword.

saaam (not official), 17 May 2024 02:40

What about "Dark Ring of Water"? It has "Ring of Water" as a subnet of its name.

saaam (not official), 17 May 2024 02:41

It just has some blemishes on it.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 17 May 2024 02:41 · in reply

Yes, but Chukage isn't from an edition where "subsets" were recognized. A keyword or name were complete and couldn't be broken apart.

saaam (not official), 17 May 2024 02:41

😦

A player, 17 May 2024 06:32

Can the action be used while the solo personality is bowed?

[attachment: printing_1434_6_details.jpg]
saaam (not official), 17 May 2024 06:44

No, you have to be unbowed to issue a challenge. I think that holds in all ruleset editions.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 17 May 2024 07:03 · in reply

No, theres no such restiction in rulebook. Most duels requires unbowed Personality in its text.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 17 May 2024 07:04

But this ability from COAT is provided to Personality and unless its Tireless ("even if its bowed")you cant announce it from bowed guy.

A player, 17 May 2024 07:46

Thanks, that is how we played it tonight.

A player, 17 May 2024 18:53

https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#cardid=11223 : Can i use his Interrupt at the current battlefield even if he is not there ? Do Interrupts generally also fall under the "RULE OF PRESENCE" and "RULES OF LOCATION" ?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 17 May 2024 19:00 · in reply

Yes, Interrupts are also governed by Presence and Location.

A player, 18 May 2024 01:44

Just double checking, the winds override the normal lobby actions right? a player said they think that the lobby target still has to have at least 1 honor.. that's not accurate right? the winds override that?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 18 May 2024 01:46 · in reply

The Wind Lobby actions are separate and have no hidden requirements, but you can still Lobby normally too. Just only one once each turn.

A player, 18 May 2024 01:46

yeah

A player, 18 May 2024 01:46

thank you

A player, 18 May 2024 01:52

Is the stronghold ability to flip the stronghold a stronghold ability or a player ability?

A player, 18 May 2024 01:53

I believe it's a player ability

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 18 May 2024 01:54 · in reply

Yep, player. It's just reminder of its existence on the box, not the ability itself.

A player, 18 May 2024 02:28

Thanks!

A player, 18 May 2024 13:04

How does Hira Sensei work with pre-Ivory edition events? Things like Harsh Choices and the like where there's no action associated, merely the Event resolving.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 18 May 2024 13:05 · in reply

It doesn't/can't.

A player, 18 May 2024 13:21

How do All Clans Sensei work with Unaligned Strongholds - can they be used?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 18 May 2024 13:24 · in reply

(link)

A player, 20 May 2024 16:26

If two triggers activate at the same time, both from the same player, how do you know which one resolves first? For example, lets say an effect says "When the target assigns, destroy a card without an attachment in the target's unit." and another effect "When the target assigns, destroy an attachment in the target's unit" ?

saaam (not official), 20 May 2024 16:27

The active players get to pick, IIRC.

A player, 20 May 2024 16:27

Thank you.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 20 May 2024 16:34

Just check Timing Conflicts # section in 20F CR.

A player, 20 May 2024 16:35

What is the difference between "Before the battle resolves" and "After the combat segment ends" ?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 20 May 2024 16:36 · in reply

The latter is slightly sooner than the former.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 20 May 2024 16:37

Check Battle Sequence # in 20F CR

A player, 20 May 2024 16:39

ah ok, so if you move someone home with Moment of Mercy, and then return them back, if Mountains of the Phoenix is in play, and they are the only one you have there, Mountains would destroy the guy coming back?

kempy_nezumi (not official), 20 May 2024 16:39

Also Timing # Triggers #

kempy_nezumi (not official), 20 May 2024 16:41

Cards' images could help.

A player, 20 May 2024 16:41
[attachment: image.png]
A player, 20 May 2024 16:41
[attachment: image.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 20 May 2024 16:42

Yes. Mercy movement happens before destruction from Mountains.

A player, 20 May 2024 16:42

Yeah thats what I was trying to figure out, thanks!

A player, 20 May 2024 16:44 · in reply

🀣🀣:AEG: 🀣🀣

A player, 22 May 2024 21:43

how does reducing my chi to zero interact with "having a minimum chi of 5". lets say big deck rules

A player, 22 May 2024 21:46

i cant get the picture to drop. more specifically "touch of the infinite" with personality that has yogen equipped

saaam (not official), 22 May 2024 21:47

Won't reduce it lower than 5.

A player, 22 May 2024 23:12

but i can give my personality infinite -1 chi counters?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 May 2024 23:14 · in reply

When determining the current value of a stat, minimums and maximums are factored last. So, no matter how many Chi Penalties a Personality has, if they also have a "minimum Chi of X", their Chi will always be at least X. Just don't lose that sword, eh? πŸ™‚

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 May 2024 23:16

However, looking at Touch of the Infinite specifically... there is a problem.

A player, 22 May 2024 23:16 · in reply

so you agree with the first answer? when i reduce my chi to "zero" it will actually only go to 5. giving me less of an effect on my opponets personality?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 May 2024 23:19 · in reply

So... "Reduce his Chi to 0" is a cost of the Spell; if not paid, nothing happens at all. So, if his Chi doesn't drop to 0 because of the Yogen trait, you get nothing; you can't even cast it in Good Faith.

A player, 24 May 2024 03:17

Is Cavalry Engage considered an action?

A player, 24 May 2024 03:19

Yes

A player, 24 May 2024 19:57

With flame's protection, if a card target's the unit, can flames protection protect against it?

A player, 24 May 2024 20:00

I recall reading here something on the lines of targeting a unit was equivalent of targeting the personality in it, but I am not 100% sure

A player, 24 May 2024 20:06

(link)

A player, 24 May 2024 20:06

it was stated already i think

A player, 24 May 2024 20:09

I believe shougo is correct, it was a reference to Daigotsu churo and how his interrupt works in connection to Meditating Mind. In The Flame's Protection's case. If an ability's wording says something along the lines of do something to a card in a target unit, then the spell would trigger as the unit and the personality in this case are one in the same. If in contrast the ability targets a card in the unit directly the spell would not trigger as it never targets the unit.

As two examples, Meditating mind targets the unit, Your True nature targets an attachment directly.

At least that is how it works i believe

A player, 25 May 2024 15:39

I have a question about Back to the Front. Can you target a personality at the current battlefield with it and straighten them?

A player, 25 May 2024 15:41

No. The straightening happens during the movement. You can legally target them, yes, but since they're not moving, they won't straighten.

A player, 25 May 2024 15:42

Ok, thanks.

A player, 25 May 2024 16:14

Question about Latest Fashion. It says that it can be used "if the action was Political and targeted or was from this personality". I read this as the action has to be Political and wither target or be from the personality, but I have been told that it is the action either has to be Political and target the personality or be from the personality. Which reading is correct? Because those are very different readings.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 25 May 2024 17:16 · in reply

People told you wrong things. It has to be Political either way, and then additional must also have either targeted, or been from, the Personality.

A player, 25 May 2024 17:17

I thought so.

A player, 25 May 2024 21:00 · in reply

"People told you wrong" I don't like that you say it that way the card can be read "was political and targeted" thats the first parameter, "or was from this personality" that's the second...

This is the exact same issue that the poison master had.

A player, 25 May 2024 21:31

I have brought it up as card commentary on the onyx lives server.

A player, 26 May 2024 00:54

I'm unclear on "if you drew a card from the action". Can the Response be activated in response to an Expendable card draw or is that not an action?

[attachment: ROU_063.png]
A player, 26 May 2024 00:55 · in reply

My reading is that Condition 1: the action has to be political Condition 2: either targeted this personality or was from this personality

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 26 May 2024 00:59 · in reply

Expendable isn't an action, it's a triggered Rulebook effect. The draw would be from that, not from the action that destroyed the Expendable Personality.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 26 May 2024 01:00 · in reply

That's the correct reading, though it could be clearer as has been pointed out elsewhere. An adjustment may be made in the near future to add clarity, beyond the context that "targeted" is not an adjective used in game terms to describe actions.

A player, 26 May 2024 01:09 · in reply

Thank you! Time to find some additional card draw for this deck

A player, 26 May 2024 03:07

Are Kiho and Elemental actions considered spells?

A player, 26 May 2024 03:14

Pretty sure the answer is no. Spells have a different color border to show they are a spell. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

A player, 26 May 2024 03:28 · in reply

From the 20F Advanced Rulebook (pg 9). "Spells are attachments that will only attach to a Shugenja." Since Kihos and Elemental actions don't attach, they would not be considered spells.

saaam (not official), 26 May 2024 04:04

Hunh. I can't find the Kiko definition in either Celestial or Emperor.

saaam (not official), 26 May 2024 04:04

Kiho used to be considered Spell Effects, so something like Resist Magic would work on them.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 26 May 2024 07:05

Before Samurai edition, Kiho were different card type and their effects were considered as spell effects. Since Samurai edition they are just Actions/Strategies with Kiho keyword.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 26 May 2024 07:06

They dont have rulebook effect now but their effects nearly always require Monk or Shugenja to perform or target.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 26 May 2024 10:00 · in reply

To be more clear, as i wrote it wrong. Kihos were also actions in Lotus, but they got rulebook effect that got removed in Samurai and later.

From LE rules:

[attachment: image.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 26 May 2024 10:02

LE printing

[attachment: printing_691_3_details.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 26 May 2024 10:02

SE:

[attachment: printing_691_1_details.png]
A player, 27 May 2024 00:12

If this targets a Dishonorable personality, does any personality brought into play with honor more than 0 become dishonored, or does it check their printed honor?

[attachment: printing_7990_2_details.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 May 2024 00:13 · in reply

The former. It does not check printed.

A player, 27 May 2024 00:13

Thanks

A player, 27 May 2024 23:45

Does Kimiono also grant extra tokens to, say, Sincerity cards in your provinces?

[attachment: CRI_36.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 May 2024 23:47 · in reply

Only if an action gave them such a token. Responses can only Respond to actions. Sincerity's natural token-accumulation is not from an action.

A player, 27 May 2024 23:47

Right, makes sense

A player, 27 May 2024 23:47

Wonder what kind of Unicorn deck wants Kimiono in it, though that's a question for a different channel

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 May 2024 23:48 · in reply

The kind that throws out Force penalty tokens; that's something they do, right? πŸ˜›

A player, 27 May 2024 23:50

Oooooh right

A player, 28 May 2024 01:52

she is a good support piece. i do have a question about her interaction with the new khedai, his transfer ability, does it could as giving a token to the target and thuse she can effectivly double his effect by allowing him to transfer one od his force tokens to an enemy and then double it on the new target?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 28 May 2024 02:16 · in reply

Yes, she can Respond to an action that transferred a token. To "give" a token isn't a reserved game term exclusively defined as creating one from nothing, so the word's broader meanings can be applied here.

saaam (not official), 28 May 2024 02:40

You should rename Actions to "Ask"s. So you can Ask/Respond. πŸ˜„

A player, 28 May 2024 02:49

Would this allow Fear/Range/Melee to target the duel's loser even through followers or other effects like that?

A player, 28 May 2024 02:49
[attachment: printing_12401_1_details.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 May 2024 03:49 · in reply

No.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 May 2024 06:49 · in reply

i've thought that everyone who support of removal AI gfx just deleted their current folders and replaced everything with recent text only versions. πŸ™ƒ

A player, 28 May 2024 11:55 · in reply

I haven't gotten around to it yet (haven't updated Ikoma Libraries either)

A player, 28 May 2024 20:25

Would Kumoru's Open action trigger Poison Sake when the personality is assigned to the battle?

[attachment: printing_12165_1_details.png] [attachment: printing_5994_2_details.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 May 2024 20:26

Yes

A player, 28 May 2024 20:26

Cool, wasn't sure how the interaction of being assigned vs assigning your own personalities.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 May 2024 20:27

Don't forget about this guy as well. He's also good friend of Kumoru.

[attachment: printing_11228_1_details.png]
A player, 28 May 2024 20:27

oh yeah, he is in most of my spider decks

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 May 2024 20:29 · in reply

hmm, i reread this and this ability i am not sure now. ;/

A player, 28 May 2024 20:29

It still triggers off of other actions or even eing targeted though

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 28 May 2024 20:37

and @kempy_nezumi Poison Sake specifically references the Personality being assigned by his controller, so it doesn't combo with Kumoru. Tairao does not specify, so he does combo.

A player, 28 May 2024 20:38

I would argue it doesn't work because Poison Sake says when his controller assigns him. Kurmoru forces the assignment even if their controller doesn't want them too.

A player, 28 May 2024 20:38

Yeah that is what I was thinking, wanted to double check.

A player, 28 May 2024 20:38

Damn Macbeth beat me

A player, 28 May 2024 20:38

Its still really strong with Tairao

A player, 29 May 2024 18:40

question. under legacy rules. does corrupt geisha house exp allows to put the false ring of fire?

[attachment: printing_12605_1_details.png] [attachment: printing_10533_1_details.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 29 May 2024 18:41

I would say: yes.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 29 May 2024 18:43

From 20F CR:

[attachment: image.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 29 May 2024 18:43 · in reply

Kempy is correct. Infinity is higher than 10. πŸ™‚

A player, 29 May 2024 18:44

nice, thanks

A player, 29 May 2024 22:07

Question with test of the emerald champion. If the owner of the event has a personality in play but the oponent doesn't have. The duel never happens. Can the owner gain the province if the no duel happened?

[attachment: printing_7933_1_details.png]
saaam (not official), 29 May 2024 22:08

Correct.

saaam (not official), 29 May 2024 22:08

It's conditional. You lost 0 of 0 duels. Free Province!

A player, 29 May 2024 23:30

Can I get a reminder... if a card is used, and hits the discard pile, and then is returned to the hand, it can or can't be used again that turn if it doesn't have tireless?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 29 May 2024 23:32 · in reply

If it goes to the hand face-down, it is then both face-down and out of play, so it loses all "memory". Both conditions must be true at once for that to happen.

A player, 29 May 2024 23:51

Looking for 3 physical Harmony has been found. Anyone willing to sell them?

[attachment: printing_2976_1_details.png]
A player, 30 May 2024 00:21 · in reply

Thats what I thought, thank you.

A player, 30 May 2024 02:12

Rosoku Sensei vs A game of dice:

If a player has already drawn a card during their limited phase, would they get the two cards during End?

A player, 30 May 2024 02:13

that sounds like a silly question on paper, but Game of Dice is a Limited action

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 30 May 2024 02:16 · in reply

Right, so even though the cards would come at you later, the effect would be negated and not happen later.

A player, 30 May 2024 02:16

but technically if you reversed the actions, youre fine?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 30 May 2024 02:18 · in reply

As worded in the Oracle, correct, which I assume is faithful to the contemporary errata.

A player, 30 May 2024 04:53
[attachment: image.png]
A player, 30 May 2024 04:54

Are the bonuses permanent?

A player, 30 May 2024 05:10

No, until end of turn. Permanent bonuses are always described as such in the trait or ability text

A player, 30 May 2024 06:49

It's the opposite of Magic.

Which makes sense, because most bonuses are temporary, so why make the more common result take more words?

A player, 30 May 2024 21:55

Quick question: if I have Yasuki Makoto experienced in play, can I also bring in her non experienced version?

saaam (not official), 30 May 2024 21:58

If it's non-Unique, yes.

saaam (not official), 30 May 2024 21:58

As in, you could have a Unique Matsu Gohei Exp. on the table, and bring in the non-Unique, non-Experienced versions.

A player, 30 May 2024 21:58

Awesome thank you

A player, 30 May 2024 22:26

Sorry for asking another question. If I use Sukihime Sensei from the coming storm to give a non unique crane courtier my clan alignment, in this case Phoenix, does it replace crane with Phoenix or is the courtier both crane and Phoenix now?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 30 May 2024 22:27 · in reply

Both.

A player, 30 May 2024 22:27

Playing at my local game store and we're all relearning the game

A player, 30 May 2024 22:27

Great thank you MacBeth2001

A player, 30 May 2024 22:30

Then you bring back the crane Guy