Following up on this thread:
The intent of Temples of Gisei Toshi is very clear. However, I'm not sure how I can get from the card's text to the current ruling. By illustration, compare to Imperial Gift.
Temples of Gisei Toshi Limited: Bow this card: Name "Follower", "Item", or "Spell". Look at the top four cards of your Fate deck. You may show one of those cards that is of the type you named, then put it in your hand.
Imperial Gift Gain 2 Honor and search your Fate deck for an Item, show it, and put it into your hand.
When anything produces multiple effects, those effects are always severable unless explicitly declared otherwise. This thread about Imperial Gift made that clear. Quoting from the ruling there, "If the honour gain were dependent on putting an item into your hand, the text would be something like: Search your Fate deck for an Item, show it, and put it into your hand; if this put an item into your hand, gain 2 Honour."
I do not see how the wording of Temples of Gisei Toshi is mechanically distinct from the wording of Imperial Gift. The rules on making choices don't suggest that the "you may" construction continues across multiple effects without explicit text describing that relationship. The examples provided there all include specific conditional text to link subsequent effects to the choice ("If you choose this...", "If he bowed..."). There is no special rules significance assigned to then that would make this inherent in Temples of Gisei Toshi.
In order to preserve the proper functionality of the holding, should it not receive technical errata to read: You may show one of those cards that is of the type you named; if you showed a card, put it in your hand.?