Hello.
About: viewtopic.php?f=59&t=60100 Zen Said: In Marty's post, the defender is opposed; i.e., there is a legal target for a Ranged Attack. In mine, the defender is not opposed; i.e., there is no legal target for a Ranged Attack.
Notice that RA no longuer search for a opposign target. They now (under SE rules) target a card in the current battle that must be in the enemy side.
EX: Now if you use Kholl wall /shiro moto to swich the positions of 2 moto latomu basic , you will produce 2 RA in the Current battle.
One for the Moto Latomu that moves in and the other from the moto latomu that moves out.
Q) is it this way , isnt it? Or i m misreading Mlund explanation?
http://rules.l5r.com/Glossary_R#Ranged_Attack In an effect, “Ranged X Attack” (where X is a number known as the strength of the ranged attack) is shorthand for “Target a Follower or a Personality without Followers in the current enemy army. If its Force is equal to or less than X, destroy it.” A ranged attack’s strength is treated as a stat with regard to bonuses, penalties, and minimums.
[Mod edit: Thread title. Please do not use abbreviations in titles. Thanks. -ZF]