Sun and Moon #rules-questions

October 2026

Messages from the Sun and Moon #rules-questions Discord channel, copied for Oracle of the Void. Players' names are left out; the rules officials are named. Rulings are as they stood on these dates; later rulings and the rulebooks may differ.

A player, 1 October 2026 00:41 · in reply

Kuni wastealnds When bringing a Shadowlands card into play, pay 1 less Gold, or pay 4 less Gold if it is entering play from this Province. The accumulated says: Kuni Wastelands The two cost reductions are not cumulative. [DW, l5rinfo, 11/19/96] Affects all Shadowlands cards played by you. That means Fate cards as well as Dynasty. [card text] The pharse when brining of the stronghold is for they pay. After that, it gets shadowlands, so as a player says, they are not cumulative because it gains shadowalnds awhen coming into play

A player, 1 October 2026 12:41

[20F] does a personality being bowed stop its unit's items or followers from using their own bow effects?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 1 October 2026 12:41 · in reply

No.

A player, 1 October 2026 14:33 · in reply

That used to be the case in earlier editions, right? When did it change?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 1 October 2026 14:34 · in reply

No, it didn't.

A player, 1 October 2026 14:34 · in reply

pal someone scamed You hard.... was You playing with Scorpion?

A player, 1 October 2026 14:36

I thought it was something like bowed personalities can't take actions (unless specified as performed by bowed) and actions from attachments are performed by the personality

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 1 October 2026 14:38 · in reply

Nope. Transitive performing rules don't have any relation to bowed or unbowed status of the Personality, only actions on the Personality itself.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 1 October 2026 14:40 · in reply

You may be thinking about how attached Followers originally didn't contribute to the Army Force total if their Personality was bowed, whether they were or not. I can't recall when that changed offhand; maybe SE?

kempy_nezumi (not official), 1 October 2026 14:40

Earlier i think.

A player, 1 October 2026 14:40 · in reply

Nah, in lotus that was still the case

kempy_nezumi (not official), 1 October 2026 14:43 · in reply

Ah, just checked and you are both right. šŸ˜„

A player, 1 October 2026 14:46

I learn something new here pretty much every week

A player, 1 October 2026 22:56

In Jade, Could you as open on the other player turn put follower, item, etc. etc. etc.? On your personal's

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 1 October 2026 22:57 · in reply

No. Attaching attachments was something you could only do during your own Action Phase.

A player, 2 October 2026 12:39

[Jade]

Can I still use this if there is only 1 target?

[attachment: image0.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 12:43 · in reply

Probably. I'm not in a position to check contemporary Rulings right now, but I don't think the full targeting of two is "required" because you're not the one doing it.

Also, wrong tag. This isn't an [Imperial] question.

A player, 2 October 2026 12:45

Oh yeah my bad I was browsing my cards and it was within the CW cards

A player, 2 October 2026 12:45 · in reply

Ok thanks!

A player, 2 October 2026 13:15

Is there a link or anything where I can see an explanation of different formats?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:20 · in reply

Nothing concise that I'm aware of.

Are you familiar with the legality "arcs" of the original game? Gold Edition, Samurai Edition, Emperor Edition, as various examples? Most "formats" played online are just simulations of one particular arc, or sometimes a combination of two consecutive ones.

There are a few other more odder formats, like "Modern" which is only Samurai Edition forward and "Big Deck" which is 80/80 instead of 40/40 (and they're both singleton/"Highlander" formats too, I think). Not much else.

A player, 2 October 2026 13:22

Ok those are some of the main ones I was wondering about, but also what is meant by ivory vs. Ivory extended? Is extended just ivory 1 and 20f?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:29 · in reply

They were experimenting with changing the arcs and definitions starting with Ivory, so Ivory/20F/Onyx Strict, Arc, and Extended meant odd things unique to those Base Sets.

"Ivory Extended" was technically Green, Purple, Blue bug, but including all of Emperor wasn't really intended, so it wasn't meant to be a played Format. Proper "Extended" by the new definitions came with 20F, where "20F Extended" would be Purple, Blue, Black bugs.

A player, 2 October 2026 13:30 · in reply

Black bugs printed only I take it?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:31 · in reply

Well, that's the thing. The definitions only worked while the named Edition was the Current Edition.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:34 · in reply

"Ivory Arc" was Purple, and "Ivory Strict" was Blue, but once 20F came out, "20F Strict" was Black and "20F Arc" was Blue. You couldn't play "Ivory Strict" just by its bug definition anymore without also pretending that 20F onward didn't exist.

A player, 2 October 2026 13:37 · in reply

This may also be helpful https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Legend_of_the_Five_Rings

[Category:Legend of the Five Rings]
A player, 2 October 2026 13:38

Ok so one last point of clarity, what we consider ivory now would just be purple and blue? I didn't start playing until ivory so I never really saw a rotation or anything

A player, 2 October 2026 13:38

Btw: Why do Emperor and Ivory have 2 bugs?

A player, 2 October 2026 13:39

In a way I can see how it makes sense to have 2 bugs for rotation but thats also why im a little confused about this lol

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:41 · in reply

Ivory and Emperor operated under different arc-legality systems. Some Emperor cards (and all sets prior) had sets that only have 1 bug. Going forward from Ivory, all sets were to have 2 bugs for the rolling "Strict/Arc/Extended" formats I described above.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:44 · in reply

"Just Ivory" would technically be only purple, but 20F brought a number of Rules/Format changes/improvements such that they're almost always played together, usually in 20F Arc or 20F Extended Formats.

A player, 2 October 2026 13:47

What's the Eternity bug? I don't think I've even seen it

[attachment: 120px-L5r_eternity_bug.svg.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:48 · in reply

Short answer: A bad idea.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 2 October 2026 13:52 · in reply

Long Answer: It appears they wanted to add more "value" to their expensive and frequent Direct to Player sets, so in Forgotten Legacy DtP, which was dual CE/EE legal, they marked a few of its exclusive cards with this additional 3rd bug and promised those cards would always be legal, in every arc going forward (hence "Eternity").

Of course, this caused them to have to nerf the sh out of most of them with promo MRPs come Ivory, where the power scale was nowhere near that of CE/EE. šŸ˜›

kempy_nezumi (not official), 2 October 2026 13:53 · in reply

Have you checked (link) and DropBox link. It should answer all of your questions (in specific files).

kempy_nezumi (not official), 2 October 2026 13:57

Like Ivory/20F tournaments legality is in Tournament folder and in Floor Rules there.

A player, 2 October 2026 13:59 · in reply

Yeah i was looking through it its a great resource thanks a lot guys I really appreciate the help

A player, 3 October 2026 18:08

[Jade]

Can it destroy a bowed Personality?

[attachment: image0.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 3 October 2026 18:16 · in reply

No. In Jade, you can't target your own bowed Personalities with actions, and that action targets.

A player, 3 October 2026 18:56

[Jade]

Can I copy a Personality that has Kitsuki Kaagi’s Journal attached?

[attachment: image0.jpg] [attachment: image1.jpg]
Answers on: Kitsuki Kaagi
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 3 October 2026 18:57 · in reply

No. The Egg targets.

A player, 3 October 2026 18:58

Thanks for the quick responses!

A player, 3 October 2026 19:21 · in reply

Corollary: Egg can’t copy one of your bowed personalities.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 3 October 2026 19:27 · in reply

I assume also [Jade]? If so, correct.

A player, 3 October 2026 19:31 · in reply

It is a corollary on the original question that was already [Jade]

A player, 4 October 2026 06:16

[Jade] Can a non-ninja character with Kitsuki Kaaagi's journal attach a Night Medallion?

saaam (not official), 4 October 2026 06:27

Yes, you can, since it targets a Ninja.

A player, 4 October 2026 15:45

[Imperial]

Will the Egg copy inherit the Utter Defeat trait, like the 1 honor loss per turn, etc?

[attachment: image.png] [attachment: printing_9122_2_details.png]
Answers on: Utter Defeat
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 4 October 2026 15:49 · in reply

Yes. Clarifications to Egg indicate that it copies current ongoing permanent effects on its target, which would include the effects of Utter Defeat.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:04 · in reply

[Open]

Oh so I can equip Bayushi Togai with Poison Dartgun for free if he has the Journal attached? @Brook Cunningham Not sure if you remember my question from way back haha

A player, 6 October 2026 00:10

Also for [Imperial]

If my Goshiu-exp (overlayed) is dead in my pile, can I target the Basic version with Return of The Fallen Lord?

[attachment: printing_6293_1_details.png]
A player, 6 October 2026 00:12 · in reply

No. If you already controlled that Unique card, you could not bring another copy into play.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:15 · in reply

I d say you can

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:25 · in reply

Yes, BUT... not in [Jade] or [JadeEx]; Togai isn't legal in those formats. So, only Open/Legacy.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:28 · in reply

Oh okay. got it.. but in our custom format Old Border Only it's legal... šŸ˜‹

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:31 · in reply

I think "no" may be the answer, but the explanation for your answer makes no sense. :/

a player, I am looking into it. The non-Exp Goshiu may not be considered a separate card anymore, and/or it may not count as "dead", but I'm not 100% sure?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:33

Yeah, in Jade Rules, they clarify that the underlying card is RFTG if the overlayed "stack" leaves play. With nothing clearer in the SCC Rulebook, I think it should probably act the same way in Imperial. Note, though, that the Exp Goshiu will still keep the underlying one's ability when you bring him back. You just need 1 more "Chi" of Shugenja for the Fallen Lord Ritual.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:37 · in reply

Whoa cool I did not know that it keeps the underlying ability, that's actually better imo

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:39 · in reply

They removed the inheriting of Abilities via overlaying in Emperor Edition, for greater ease of bookkeeping, but before that, it's still a thing.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:39

On a related note for [Imperial], does the Chi of the one holding the RItual count towards the required number?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:40 · in reply

Nope. He bows and dies separately from the count towards the Chi.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:44 · in reply

Same with Feign Death I assume?

A player, 6 October 2026 00:45

and one of my pet cards... A Greater Destiny?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:46 · in reply

Yes, same principle.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 00:49 · in reply

Yes, although only for Imperial through Diamond, not in most/all Legacy Formats, because from Lotus onward, cards that go face down and out of play, such as back into the deck, don't retain any memory of effects upon them, like inherited abilities from overlaying.

A player, 6 October 2026 00:50

Cool

A player, 6 October 2026 19:51

[Imperial]

When a Personality with Utter Defeat effects die and I bring it back with Feign Death, does it still have the UD effects?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 6 October 2026 21:36 · in reply

I can't find a contemporary Ruling on the matter, so I think "while they are alive" should be considered a fixed, ongoing duration that ends when they die, just like the SE reprint that explicitly states "while they remain in play". Thus, dying would end the effect, and using the Imperial Feign Death would bring the back without it (though they would still be dishonorable).

A player, 9 October 2026 12:39

[Jade] : Does the SH have to be unbowed to use the reaction ? Can i use the reaction when recruiting the personality with the SH ?

[attachment: printing_8248_1_details.png]
A player, 9 October 2026 12:40

In this version it's explicitly mentioned...

[attachment: printing_8248_3_details.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 October 2026 12:42 · in reply

Yes, it has to be unbowed. No, you can't do it while Recruiting; it's just a cost reduction while Equipping normally, not anything further than that like sequence breaking permission.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 October 2026 12:44 · in reply

This was a printing from a Learn to Play set, where some understood things were made explicit to be easier for beginners.

A player, 9 October 2026 12:49 · in reply

But i could pay the rest of the reduced cost for the follower using the SH ?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 October 2026 12:50 · in reply

Yes.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 October 2026 12:52

Producing Gold and the Reaction have the same timing trigger, "when paying", so take the Reaction first while the Stronghold is unbowed, then bow for Gold for the now-reduced cost.

A player, 9 October 2026 13:08

[Jade]: I did not find a Jade Version of her. But according to https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#cardid=5097,#cnprintingid=1 she is legal in Jade(Ext) ?

[attachment: printing_5097_1_details.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 October 2026 13:09 · in reply

She's legal in Jade. Oracle does not have a Jade Ex legality marker.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 9 October 2026 13:12

For most of the time that Jade Ex was a contemporary format, she was also legal in Jade Ex. However, the last published Floor Rules contemporary to that time removed the Rule from Jade Ex format that made her legal. If your TO is following those Rules for their Jade Ex tournament, she is not legal.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 9 October 2026 13:14

In our JadeEx event you need to follow this: (link)

kempy_nezumi (not official), 9 October 2026 13:17

So if there exists a printing of such card with Jade bug, its legal. Not all cards in SnM database may link to such version but you may include any version and play it as specific Jade bugged version.

A player, 9 October 2026 13:18

šŸ‘

A player, 10 October 2026 00:06

Hi, can i use a Nio Sensei with Spawning ground stronghold, as my Starting honor will drop to -20

Answers on: Nio Sensei
A player, 10 October 2026 00:07

?

A player, 10 October 2026 01:08

[3D] Akodo Yosuke seems quite powerful. If he is defending and the attacker uses Naval, does Yosuke's controller get the first battle action (ie beating Naval)?

A player, 10 October 2026 01:14 · in reply

assuming [jade] rulings this won't make you lose and I doubt they ever reversed it

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 10 October 2026 01:20 · in reply

Yes, the standing Ruling is that -FH Sensei will not cause Shadowlands Horde to auto-lose.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 10 October 2026 01:25 · in reply

Assuming Yosuke's "Engage" is used after the Naval Rulebook Engage ability, then yes, the later "you have the first opportunity to act" from Yosuke overrides the previous from Naval.

A player, 10 October 2026 01:27 · in reply

Thanks, seems very good then

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 10 October 2026 01:28 · in reply

It's a significant upgrade over the original "Soul" card, which was quite powerful itself but could only be used on the Attack, not while Defending.

A player, 10 October 2026 07:24

[Imperial]

Is this one big honor loss?

[attachment: image0.jpg]
A player, 10 October 2026 07:56 · in reply

If you suffer multiple losses of honor simultaneously, you do not merge them into one big loss. Each lossmust be dealt with individually. [summary of other rulings]

1998 accumulated rulings

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 10 October 2026 12:43

and a player Note that this isn't the case under more modern Rules than [Imperial]. Once L5R got on the "Comprehensive Rules" train, "X for each Y" was clearly defined in them as a single X effect (multipled in value by Y, of course), not multiple Xs.

A player, 11 October 2026 19:04 · in reply

thanks

A player, 12 October 2026 09:22

[Jade/Legacy] : When i play with "The New Akasha" and use "Oath of Fealty" (either in Jade(Ext) or Legacy) do crab personalities lose the +1F/+1C bonus from the SH, as they are not Crab anymore ?

[attachment: printing_8234_1_select.png] [attachment: printing_5641_7_details.png] [attachment: printing_5641_9_details.png]
A player, 12 October 2026 09:55 · in reply

yeah in either format they would lose their original faction traits and thus lose any benefit you would get for them being crabs since crab is a faction trait

A player, 12 October 2026 09:59

jade lists some exceptions for like ninja or monks swearing fealty but crab clan is just crab clan

A player, 12 October 2026 18:01

[Imperial]

When I use the ability copied by NSS, is it considered a Ninja action?

[attachment: printing_5579_2_details.png]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 October 2026 18:01 · in reply

Yes.

A player, 12 October 2026 18:25

Appreciate the good taste of showing the Imperial version of the cardšŸ§‘ā€šŸ³šŸ˜˜

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 12 October 2026 18:27 · in reply

The Ron Spencer art is really great... or were you specifically praising the gold trim on the border? ;P

A player, 12 October 2026 18:33 · in reply

Both + old card template. Perfection.

A player, 13 October 2026 06:57

[Open/ legacy]sorry if this is a silly question, im curious how the governor's estate (stronghold) interacts with the ninjutsu traint on alot of ninja cards, can you still use ninjutsu if you put them into play with the strong holds ability, and if you bring them in with the 4 cost from ninjutsu do they become both and holdind and a 2/3 personality, i tried looking some stuff up about it but it isnt clear how the cards interact with each other

A player, 13 October 2026 06:58

https://images.oracleofthevoid.com/l5r/9b/d7/printing_8106_1_details.jpg

kempy_nezumi (not official), 13 October 2026 07:33

Format tag please. I believe its something really niche as Emperor era Legacy draft as this Stronghold (and any other Draft Strongholds) are banned in nearly every Legacy/Open format.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 13 October 2026 07:41 · in reply

(link)

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 13 October 2026 10:42 · in reply

As Kempy said, this is a pretty niche. If you're Drafting Diamond/Lotus era cards but using the Emperor-era Draft box instead of the contemporary Nanashi Mura... I'd just kinda decide among yourselves how it should run? :/

A player, 13 October 2026 11:03 · in reply

in the legacy rules for ninjutsu it specifies that the ninjutsu rules only are in effect if there is an ability that allows at least one player to look at the face down card with ninjutsu (probably shiro no soshi) I'm sure it could be possible to create a convoluted situation to get around this but i think basically you would have to have Shiro no Soshi and The Governor's Estate as your stronghold at the same time somehow otherwise this just probably would never come up

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 13 October 2026 12:03 · in reply

Ah, thanks. I didn't remember that particular added clause in the Legacy Rules.

a player So, there would be no interaction, unless you're playing some odd mix wherein you have a Governor's Estate with Ninjutsu Personalities in it, and one of your opponents is playing Shiro no Soshi. But again, as I said above, if you're that far outside standard play, at that point you can just decide amongst yourselves as players.

A player, 13 October 2026 13:08

Thanks for the replys, i normally play open with my local group and ive been playing a ninjustu deck lately and i saw the stronghold and thought it was a weird interaction, i didnt realise those strongholds wernt ment to be play outside of a draft format, (i didnt play at the time they were printed) so i was wondering if there was rulings on those sort of interactions.

A player, 14 October 2026 13:19

[Imperial]

Can this Stronghold ability negate/nullify Deadly Ground?

[attachment: image0.jpg]
Answers on: Deadly Ground
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 13:22 · in reply

Yes.

A player, 14 October 2026 13:26

Absolutely

A player, 14 October 2026 13:37 · in reply

Why does it override the Deadly Ground ability? Since negating isn’t destroying the terrain

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 13:38 · in reply

The timing is a bit unclear, but it's intended to negate any Terrain before the Terrain takes effect.

A player, 14 October 2026 13:46

Deadly Ground takes effect immediately upon being played, so the SH Reaction is like faster than the DG taking effect immediately

[attachment: image0.jpg]
Answers on: Deadly Ground
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 13:51 · in reply

The Gold Edition Stronghold wording and GE Terrain mechanics make the intended interaction clearer. My understanding is that this didn't effectively change the way they always interacted.

A player, 14 October 2026 20:26

the other day i have doubts about a couple of card interactions in legacy:

Answers on: Bayushi, O-Ushi Sensei
A player, 14 October 2026 20:28

When i activate first Bayushi ability agains a player with o-ushi sensei, can he change the stat to force? Is first Bayushi ability only permanent on him?

[attachment: printing_735_1_details.jpg] [attachment: printing_5635_1_details.jpg]
A player, 14 October 2026 20:43

And the second question is about interaction between this two cards. When i use a martyr against a crab personality that have killed my personality he used an Imperial command to redirect it to Jinn-Kuen, and payed 2 gold to negate the action effects, is that legal right?

[attachment: printing_3686_1_details.jpg] [attachment: printing_4844_1_details.jpg] [attachment: printing_9445_1_details.jpg]
Answers on: Imperial Command
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:22 · in reply

No. "Checking" a stat is when an effect looks at a stat and produces an effect based on the value of the stat, not when it affects the stat directly.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:26 · in reply

Not enough information. How did the first Crab "kill" your Personality? Was it via Battle Resolution where Jinn-Kuen was also present in the army? If "no", then Jinn-Kuen is not a legal target to redirect Martyr to. If "yes", was the first Crab Unique? If "no", then Imperial Command cannot be played at all.

A player, 14 October 2026 21:41 · in reply

And is Bayushi second ability only permanent on himself and until end of turn for the rest?

A player, 14 October 2026 21:41 · in reply

was a duel from benjiro

[attachment: printing_3078_1_details.jpg]
A player, 14 October 2026 21:42 · in reply

And can you make an example of that?

A player, 14 October 2026 21:42

thanks

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:43 · in reply

Correct.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:44 · in reply

Then, even though Martyr targets, it can only target Benjiro, because only Benjiro killed your Personality. Jinn-Kuen is not a legal target for redirection.

A player, 14 October 2026 21:44

Lovely thanks for your answers

A player, 14 October 2026 21:48 · in reply

So, o ushi sensei can change a Testo of Honor to a Test of ā€œStrengthā€, right?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:49 · in reply

Correct. That was my go-to first example. And she changes Chi duels to Force for her player (but I had to Oracle some clarifying text onto her for that based on contemporary rulings, as a duel isn't exactly a direct "check"). I was looking for more, but hopefully you understand?

A player, 14 October 2026 21:50

I guess

A player, 14 October 2026 21:50

Check as in compare, I imagine

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:54 · in reply

Right, but only as effects, not targeting; so it's kind of niche, mainly for duels and a few other things. Like, if the targeting requirements are specifically looking at Chi, you can't change that and have the targeting fail or make them pick something else. O-Ushi doesn't affect anything until after targeting has already occurred.

A player, 14 October 2026 21:55 · in reply

So it does not prevent Hida Amoro from being kolat mastered/assassined

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 21:58 · in reply

Correct.

A player, 14 October 2026 23:09
[attachment: printing_5635_1_details.png]
A player, 14 October 2026 23:11

Before the resolution of another player's card's action that targeted one of your Personalities: Each time it checks your Personalities' Chi or Personal Honor, you may have it check the Personality's Force instead. After your Personality enters a duel, if the duel was from another player's card's effect: You may choose to have your Personality use Force as his duel stat in that duel. You will not gain Honor from duels.

A player, 14 October 2026 23:12

So why it doesn't stop Kolat Master?

A player, 14 October 2026 23:27

because the targeting has already occured and the target was already leagal.

A player, 14 October 2026 23:28

the diff with ToH is that despite the target being legal, on reolution it is targeting strength so likely it will fail

A player, 14 October 2026 23:28

is that not the same as a range attck?

A player, 14 October 2026 23:29

what do you mean=

A player, 14 October 2026 23:31

6F peep get's targeted with a 6RA reaction to the range attack Sun Setting Strike get's played now the peep is 9F ra hits but fails to kill the peep

A player, 14 October 2026 23:33

Sensei even with the new wording says "Before resolution of another player's"

A player, 14 October 2026 23:34

no because kolats are targeting requirement and ranged are checked on resolution against the strength

A player, 14 October 2026 23:34

exaclty before resolution but after targeting

A player, 14 October 2026 23:36

it already fulfilled the targeting

A player, 14 October 2026 23:36

you are switching before resolution

A player, 14 October 2026 23:37

yes

A player, 14 October 2026 23:37

but kolat actions say target a personality with X chi that s on targeting

A player, 14 October 2026 23:37

then once target is said on resolution you kill/strewl

A player, 14 October 2026 23:38

ranged on targeting has non constraitns you can target a personality of strength 10 with a ranged attack of 2

A player, 14 October 2026 23:38

yet, on resolution it will fail

A player, 14 October 2026 23:40

to be honest it makes no sense the way the sensei is written even with the new wording and you say that it still can stop KM

saaam (not official), 14 October 2026 23:42

I'm kind of there as well. I was going to argue that it stops it, but I can't quite see how. The "printed wording" would make O-Ushi Sensei stop KM, as an example. From what I recall, that's how it was played back then, but my memory on that is fuzzy, and nothing in the Accumulated Rulings talks about it.

A player, 14 October 2026 23:43

The problem is that sensei say before resolution of the action

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 14 October 2026 23:46

It was a Legacy question, anyway. It might've been different contemporarily, but I don't think so and can't find any contradictions in contemporary Rulings.

A player, 14 October 2026 23:48

Ok but do you see where the issue is? @Brook Cunningham

A player, 14 October 2026 23:50

but isn't it supported by the Jade rulesbook? What I understand is that first you target then resolve the action. So, resolution happens when the action resolves and the sensei explicitly says before resolution and that is after targeting happend and all the requirements have been met

[attachment: Screenshot_2026-10-15_at_01.48.32.png]
A player, 14 October 2026 23:58

does that make more sense a player ?

A player, 14 October 2026 23:59

nope

A player, 14 October 2026 23:59

again the targeting is not the problem

A player, 15 October 2026 00:00

But if the targeting is when the target requirements are checked and met or not which is a stage before the resolution of thea ction stage and in that stage o ushi has not even checked the card. And targeting has been legal, how would it fail on resolution?

A player, 15 October 2026 00:00

retroactiveloy going to target and making it fail?

A player, 15 October 2026 00:01

in those 2 paragraph doesn't tell me if I can react

A player, 15 October 2026 00:01

React with what?

A player, 15 October 2026 00:02

What we have been talking about the O-Ushi sensei

A player, 15 October 2026 00:02

O ushi sensei does not react is a static ability that check before resolution

A player, 15 October 2026 00:02

0th pay costs 1st targeting 2nd resolution

In the middle of 1st and 2nd happens O ushi sensei check

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 15 October 2026 00:04

I'm a little busy to try and weigh in, but ego is doing a good enough job.

A player, 15 October 2026 00:08

Just at of curiosity What are you thinking if KM get's played and I apply the sensei?

A player, 15 October 2026 00:13

What do you mean?

A player, 15 October 2026 00:14

If I play KM on a legal target and you apply sensei, the Kolat master will successfully resolve regardless the strength of the target personality

A player, 15 October 2026 00:15

What do you mean with what am I thinking?šŸ¤”

A player, 15 October 2026 00:18

Nvm all good

A player, 15 October 2026 00:53

Yeah o-ushi says before resolution. On the orcacle side for KM and KA there is a ā€œ:ā€ so the targeting and checking already happened before resolution. But if you go as the base card wording the checking and targeting happens during resolution.

A player, 15 October 2026 19:06

[Imperial]

Does the ability or stat it last copied get removed before the new duel starts?

[attachment: printing_5580_2_details.png]
A player, 15 October 2026 19:07

i would say yes by the phrasing

saaam (not official), 15 October 2026 19:07

Yeah, including the MRP clarification as well as the overall template rewording.

saaam (not official), 15 October 2026 19:07

The moment it issues a new challenge using that ability, the previously-copied stat/ability is wiped.

A player, 15 October 2026 19:13

Thanks

A player, 16 October 2026 07:51

[OBH] Does copying a personality that has madness tokens and Force/Chi tokens with Egg of P'an Ku copy the tokens? And if it doesn't copy the tokens, does the copy have the unmodified or the modified stats?

A player, 16 October 2026 08:22

In legacy, no tokens were copied as they weren't on the card. The Stat copied will be the total when the tokens modifiers were calculated. The effects of Tokens that only lasted for a time weren't taken into account.

A player, 17 October 2026 10:56

If you are playing Jade Extended is Rise from the Ashes a political Action? When you read the card in Oracle it says political

[attachment: printing_6342_1_details.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 17 October 2026 10:57 · in reply

Yes. That was a contemporary ruling/clarification.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 17 October 2026 10:59

From JE rulebook:

[attachment: image.png]
A player, 17 October 2026 10:59

Beware those Enough Talk🚨

kempy_nezumi (not official), 17 October 2026 11:00
[attachment: image.png]
A player, 17 October 2026 11:01

thanks

A player, 18 October 2026 20:53

I'm trying to remember how the yu works on the Crab card. Is it when a Personality dies is when he/she can kill other personality?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 18 October 2026 20:59 · in reply

New Shattered Empire/3 Dynasties Yu, or old Gold/Diamond era Yu? Please tag your questions with "[Format]" at the beginning of them.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 18 October 2026 21:54 · in reply

The Legacy Rules for Yu are thus:

"Yu is a keyword that represents harming your opponent even if it means your death, and is followed by a numerical value.

If one or more cards with the Yu keyword are in a losing army during Battle Resolution, each may destroy an enemy Follower, or an enemy Personality without Followers, that has Force less than or equal to the losing card’s Yu value. Multiple cards may also combine their Yu values to destroy a single card, but one card may not split its Yu to destroy multiple cards. This occurs after determining the battle's outcome but before destroying the losing side. Destroying cards in this way does not alter the outcome of the battle, and it does not earn the loser any Honor. Using the Yu keyword is not an action, and is not targeted. The Attacker or Defender makes all decisions for all Yu values in his army, and can use the keywords in any order.

When giving a bonus to the Yu value of a card that does not have the keyword, give the card Yu 0 before receiving the bonus, which remains for the same duration as the bonus (this is a change from the earlier rule that gave Yu 0 permanently)."

A player, 18 October 2026 22:40

Okay. Thank you for your time.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 19 October 2026 02:52 · in reply

(link)

A player, 19 October 2026 19:08

[3D] Is the force of the dragon created by this personality zero?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Jeff Williamson (rules official), 19 October 2026 19:10 · in reply

- creates a "Dragon Channeler", not a "Dragon" - unprinted values for created cards are 0 by default, so yes, 0F/2C

A player, 19 October 2026 19:10 · in reply

Got it, thanks

A player, 20 October 2026 20:28

[3D] I have a question regarding the recon mechanics. What does it mean to have recon? Is there some effect that gives you recon? Or having a scout personality is enough?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 20 October 2026 20:31 · in reply

To answer the second question first: You "have Recon at a Province's battlefield" if you have targeted the Province that turn with an action that has the "Recon" keyword.

What that means is there are certain other actions or traits that check if you have Recon or not at the time they are taken or resolve.

A player, 20 October 2026 20:34 · in reply

Does the recon survive after a phase ends? For example, if I target a province in the open Phase, during the battle phase the game remembers that I have recon?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 20 October 2026 20:36 · in reply

Yes. All effects last until the end of turn unless otherwise explicitly stated.

A player, 20 October 2026 20:36 · in reply

Thanks!

A player, 21 October 2026 04:35

[JadeEx] How the hell does this resolve? Does the dragon guy die before the duel can continue? Or does the effect of the focused card apply before it takes effect?

[attachment: image.png]
A player, 21 October 2026 04:35

like, he's gonna die after the duel regardless, but, during the duel, is the focused card considered to add to his chi?

A player, 21 October 2026 04:49 · in reply

accumulated rulings 2000: Note that cards focussed in a duel add their focus values to Chi immediately upon being played. [Emerald Edition rulebook] This means Poisoned Weapon no longer instantly kills low-Chi Personalities regardless of their focussing. [REVERSAL]

A player, 21 October 2026 04:49

I was able to find that.

A player, 21 October 2026 04:50

what is the tricky part here then?

A player, 21 October 2026 04:50

well, I didn't when I posted the question, and it took me a bit.

A player, 21 October 2026 04:51

oh well nevermind then

A player, 21 October 2026 04:52

i hadn't checked to see what all the cards in the screenshot were so I thought there might be more to this

A player, 21 October 2026 16:58

[3D] Just double-checking. For the Crab's Stronghold: no matter if I negate the shadowland part, my targeted personalities will always get dishonored in the end, right?

For the Unicorn's stronghold: If I have 2 personalities, one with 2 attachments and one of zero attachments, can I send both to an empty battlefield despite the opponent assigning personalities to defend?

[attachment: Sin_titulo_02.jpg] [attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 21 October 2026 17:03 · in reply

1. No. If you do not choose to negate the Shadowlands part, they will not be dishonored.

2. I think your question is missing some parameters? But I'll try to answer: The Personalities you may Assign in Cav Maneuvers to empty battlefields must be Scouts and each must only have 1 or 0 attachments.

A player, 21 October 2026 17:09 · in reply

follow-up questions: 1) If I choose to negate the shadowland part, only the one I target would be dishonored right? (assuming both of them are honorably personalities)

2) What does it mean cav units led by a scout with one or no attachments? I thought it meant that at least one of my units should fulfill that condition (considering that unit as the leader of my army)

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 21 October 2026 17:15 · in reply

1. You don't "target" them, you just choose which to negate the effect upon, and then yes, only the one(s) you chose would be dishonored. Also, no "assuming"; you are only allowed to choose honorable Personalities.

2. No. Only units that fulfill that condition may assign. The entire army is not "led", individual units are "led" by their Personality.

A player, 21 October 2026 17:16 · in reply

Ok. got it. Thanks a player I got both Strongholds wrong... you might want to check this

A player, 21 October 2026 17:48

[3D] Does that terrain negate the PS bonus from Bamboo Harvesters?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 21 October 2026 17:51 · in reply

Not exactly. The bonus is still there, but the maximum value is figured last.

A player, 21 October 2026 17:55 · in reply

It's similar to the scenario where an effect removes force bonusses from tokens, right?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 21 October 2026 17:56 · in reply

No.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 21 October 2026 18:02

Applying a maximum or minimum does not directly affect current bonuses or penalties. Rather, it adds a new step to the equation:

(Printed +/- bonuses/penalties), apply min/max

kempy_nezumi (not official), 22 October 2026 07:00

@everyone There's new feature in Oracle. Cards got links to rulings from various FAQ documents.

https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#cardid=4418,#cnprintingid=1

kempy_nezumi (not official), 22 October 2026 07:03

Not from all we gathered (yet), but there's more incoming i think.

Jeff Williamson (rules official), 22 October 2026 07:15 · in reply

This feature is kind of beautiful too, keywords have hover text rules info.

[attachment: image.png]
A player, 22 October 2026 07:28 · in reply

Thamks Who maintains tbe oracle?

kempy_nezumi (not official), 22 October 2026 07:31
A player, 22 October 2026 07:31

Thank you a player

A player, 22 October 2026 13:24

Thanks all. I wasn't sure how long that update to several thousand cards was going to take so I fell asleep before it was done and missed making the announcement.

A player, 22 October 2026 14:02

[jade]

I have Regions of Rokugan revealed in my rightmost provice. I use it to go fetch Plains of Otosan Uchi and attach it to my rightmost province.

Do I reveal the second card placed I placed on the ā€œsecond subprovinceā€ of Plains of Otosan Uchi in that same turn?

A player, 22 October 2026 14:07

oracle text

[attachment: Screenshot_2026-10-22_090639.png]
A player, 22 October 2026 14:07

https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#cardid=5979

kempy_nezumi (not official), 22 October 2026 14:08 · in reply

But in Lotus you could.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 October 2026 14:08 · in reply

Yeah, that's the MRP, though. Might have been different in contemporary Jade.

A player, 22 October 2026 14:18 · in reply

That might have confused me.

A player, 22 October 2026 14:18

So in the context of Jade: nošŸ¤

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 October 2026 14:25 · in reply

In the context of Jade, no one has given you an answer yet.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 October 2026 14:25

It would take some looking up I haven't done yet.

A player, 22 October 2026 15:08 · in reply

Nice this is really great

A player, 22 October 2026 15:37

Jade Edition rulebook: refills are always face down - p. 32, Events Phase: after an Event resolves, "the empty Province is filled with a new card from the Dynasty Deck, which is placed face down in the vacant slot. This new card will not be revealed until your next turn." [p. 32](<https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#rulebook=jade,#page=32,#find=This%20new%20card%20will%20not%20be%20revealed%20until%20your%20next%20turn>;) - p. 59, Glossary "Province": "If a Province is ever empty, refill it immediately with a face-down card from your Dynasty Deck." [p. 59](<https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#rulebook=jade,#page=59,#find=If%20a%20Province%20is%20ever%20empty%20refill%20it%20immediately>;) - p. 42, Dynasty Phase: "Once a card is brought into play or discarded from a Province, it is immediately replaced by a face-down card from the top of the Dynasty Deck." [p. 42](<https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#rulebook=jade,#page=42,#find=it%20is%20immediately%20replaced%20by%20a%20face-down%20card>;) - p. 43, Dynasty Phase: "Discarded cards are immediately replaced with face-down cards from the Dynasty Deck." [p. 43](<https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#rulebook=jade,#page=43,#find=Discarded%20cards%20are%20immediately%20replaced>;) - p. 15, Turn summary: Events "are resolved and then replaced by new face-down Dynasty cards"; Dynasty Phase: "Fill any empty Province with a face-down Dynasty card." [p. 15](<https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#rulebook=jade,#page=15,#find=replaced%20by%20new%20face-down>;)

A player, 22 October 2026 15:38

I'm pretty sure it was that way until lotus wackiness

A player, 22 October 2026 15:39

the p59 is probably the smoking gun.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 22 October 2026 16:03

So it's just a matter of specific Diamond and Lotus versions that contain info you may refill in order you want. Pre Diamond Plains doesn;t have such info. And Emperor one got completely new wording too.

A player, 22 October 2026 18:03

[Imperial]

If the NSS copies Kachiko's ability and all used on a Personality and it's not enough to kill the Personality and the turn ends, do the Seduction tokens given by the NSS get removed?

Kachiko also used her ability on the Personality

[attachment: 801_2_details.png] [attachment: 5579_2_details.png]
A player, 22 October 2026 18:14

Before pearl, no. Then it was Open: Once per turn, the Ninja Shapeshifter can copy the Force, the Chi, the Personal Honor, or one ability of any one Personality in play, until the end of the turn. All tokens created by a copied ability are destroyed at the end of the turn." [MRP, Pearl Edition] but if both targeted the same personality, all seduction tokens are removed when kachiko straightens or is destroyed, because all af them are seduction tokens

A player, 22 October 2026 18:17

Ok as long as Kachiko is in play, Seduction tokens won't get removed even though NSS stops having the ability at the end of turn? In Clan Wars/ Imperial

A player, 22 October 2026 18:18

Yep

A player, 22 October 2026 18:19

They disappear even if the NSS targets another personality, because it says all tokens , not all tokens in that target

A player, 22 October 2026 18:28 · in reply

Sorry I'm a bit confused

A player, 22 October 2026 18:39

When kachiko straightens or is killed, all seduction tokens are destroyed. It doesn't matter who creates them or where they are are

A player, 22 October 2026 18:40

The destroyed part was added in obsidian eads, "Bayushi Kachiko 0F/2C -HR 10G 1PH Scorpion Clan Seductress. Unique. Limited: Bow to put a -1C seduction token on any Personality. Add a seduction token each turn she chooses not to straighten. If Seductress straightens or is destroyed, all seduction tokens are removed. May remain bowed." [MRP, Obsidian Edition

A player, 22 October 2026 18:40

So if you play clan wars and kachiko is destroyed, the tokens stay.

A player, 22 October 2026 18:57 · in reply

Obsidian is also under Clan Wars though

A player, 22 October 2026 19:10

Then consider that the text in kachiko. Not an expert in formats

A player, 22 October 2026 19:23

Sorry just saw a Ruling on Copying Only the copied ability itself, tokens created by it, and effects whose durations depend on the originating card (for example, "until this card straightens") disappear at the end of the turn. Non-token changes with set durations (like "permanent" or "until your next Straighten Phase"), changes in state (bowing, destruction, etc.), and changes to Family Honor persist normally. [rulebook, and DW, l5rinfo, 3/11/97. also l5rinfo 2/99]

So I think the Seduction tokens created by NSS is removed end of turn. Sad...

A player, 22 October 2026 19:56

Then so it is. Probably the errata on NSS was to write this rule in the card

A player, 22 October 2026 19:58

I need to reread a lot of rules..

A player, 22 October 2026 22:05

Just a general question. Can one play open during the battle action? Like for bring in the vold ring. 'Legacy"

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 22 October 2026 22:07

That used to be the case for certain Editions, but later, it was not. The updated text in the Oracle of the Void lists all printed "Open" actions that could have been taken during Battle also in the more modern "Battle/Open" format.

A player, 22 October 2026 22:08

OK, was double checking. thanks

A player, 23 October 2026 12:54

[3D] If all the enemy personalities are dishonorable, can I still use this card to draw one card at the end of my turn?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 23 October 2026 12:57 · in reply

Yes. There are no costs to the action, only effects, and some effects of an action can fail while others do not, unless they are linked by the word "to" (as in "do X to do Y").

A player, 23 October 2026 12:58 · in reply

Thanks!

A player, 23 October 2026 15:35

[3D]: Is that correct or a typo ? Do we have to keep track if a weapon was discarded from hand or destroyed from play ? Or is both meant with it ?

[attachment: 3D_054_details.png]
A player, 23 October 2026 15:38

Discarded means in your discard pile

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 23 October 2026 15:39 · in reply

Only Personalities are "dead" or "discarded" as two different states in the discard pile, no other card types.

A player, 23 October 2026 15:50

šŸ‘

A player, 23 October 2026 16:47

20 festivals, cavalry is a player action so only one unit can move using the cavalry action each turn. Please tell me that's wrong 🤠

kempy_nezumi (not official), 23 October 2026 16:48

Yes, its once per turn player's ability.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 23 October 2026 16:48

Same for 20F naval.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 23 October 2026 16:49 · in reply

That is correct for 20 Festivals and Ivory Edition, as well as the fan-continuation Arcs Onyx and Shattered Empire.

A player, 23 October 2026 16:49

Geez. Guess that's fair. I'm gonna have to improve a lot to make up for that.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 23 October 2026 16:52 · in reply

The next, new fan continuation set/Arc that was just released days ago, "3 Dynasties", returns to a more traditional Cavalry mechanic with 2 Maneuvers Segments, but some additional restrictions on the latter.

A player, 23 October 2026 21:14

[3D] Can I use this if the personality is destroyed at battle resolution?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
A player, 23 October 2026 21:19

Yes

A player, 23 October 2026 21:23 · in reply

Follow up question: Does it happen before or after the province is destroyed?

A player, 23 October 2026 21:29

After, as technically the army and province are destroyed simultaneously

A player, 23 October 2026 21:29
[attachment: IMG_1764.png]
A player, 24 October 2026 09:57

[3D] What happens if I declare Naval against a personality who has this weapon attached?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
A player, 24 October 2026 12:00

The trait triggers and reverts first Battle action to your opponent

A player, 24 October 2026 12:20 · in reply

Thank you! a player you were right

A player, 24 October 2026 12:21 · in reply

for as much good as it did me šŸ™

A player, 25 October 2026 00:45

[3D] If the personality targeted by him doesn't assign in that turn, the personality still is dishonored if they assign in the following turn?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 25 October 2026 00:49 · in reply

No. The effect only lasts until the end of the turn. It would have to say, "After the next time the target assigns this game".

A player, 25 October 2026 00:50 · in reply

Got it, thanks

kempy_nezumi (not official), 25 October 2026 20:24

@Brook Cunningham Don got hands on my shattered backup of AEG forum rules 2007-2015 so they should be in Oracle soon. Probably no more forum pages screenshots from me šŸ˜„

A player, 25 October 2026 20:26

yeah, looks like i was able to pull about 9k rulings from it

A player, 25 October 2026 20:26

going to attempt to have the bot sift through applicability automatically

A player, 25 October 2026 20:27

also pulling 3k rulings from this channel.

A player, 25 October 2026 20:27

i'm guessing there's a lot of overlap, so we'll see how it can condense it.

A player, 25 October 2026 20:28

related: I ran a claude PRO, then claude MAX out of tokens this week.

A player, 26 October 2026 20:56

[3D] Sorry if this was ask already, does bamboo harvesters counts as part of the deck_ or we need to have 41 dynasty cards?

A player, 26 October 2026 20:59

41

A player, 26 October 2026 21:00

Bamboo Harvesters works for peeps going second

A player, 26 October 2026 23:03

[Jade]

https://oracleofthevoid.com/#game=l5r,#cardid=9122,#cnprintingid=2

I’ve seen Utter Defeat had an erratum in SE of ā€œbeing destroyed at ballte resolution.

Just checking this was not like that under Jade rules, wasn’t it?

In Jade you could Utter Defeat a character being killed say by a ranged attack during battle. Am I right?

Answers on: Utter Defeat, Wedge
A player, 26 October 2026 23:07

Also, I cannot Utter Defeat a character dead by Wedge (same [Jade] context), correct? As Wedge kills after the battle not at battle and even though if it were in battle I couldn ā€˜t target. Where as I can Feing Death (since the 2004 ruling won’t apply)

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 26 October 2026 23:25 · in reply

The SL printing says "by a duel or battle". It does not say "during battle" but "by a... battle", therefore it seems that the original could also only react to Battle Resolution, which is the only time a "battle" itself is destroying the Personality. The SE MRP is clearer, but I do not think it is a "change".

A player, 26 October 2026 23:59

[3D] If a strategy targets a courtier, does the trait of this stronghold work by targeting a Magistrate in the same location or the strategy must target the courtier for the trait to work?

[attachment: Sin_titulo.jpg]
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 October 2026 00:03 · in reply

The Strategy action must be checking your Magistrate's Personal Honor. You may then switch that check to Chi. Does that help?

A player, 27 October 2026 00:04 · in reply

Yes, it does. Thanks!

A player, 27 October 2026 00:19 · in reply

Just to be super clear, the trait also works if the strategy creates a duel using PH?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 October 2026 00:28 · in reply

Yes.

A player, 27 October 2026 09:22

[Imperial]

Since they have the same timing window: If after focus cards are revealed and the active player has the first prio to play PW, and the Chi is still 3, can the other player still react with the Yoshi ability or the PW will kill the personality? Since PW says minus 3 to CHI and not FV

[attachment: image0.jpg] [attachment: image1.jpg]
Answers on: Yoshi
Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 October 2026 09:58 · in reply

Even though they have the same timing/trigger, if played first, the PW will fully resolve and kill before the opportunity to React with Yoshi.

A player, 27 October 2026 11:54 · in reply

In this case, the Active player gets to react first, right? Active meaning it’s their turn or cos it’s their action that initiated the duel? Hope that makes sense…

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 October 2026 11:56 · in reply

Active means the player whose turn it is. I'm not actually sure if that is the same Reaction priority for contemporary Clan War/Imperial though? Can't quickly look it up right now, but you could! All Rulebooks are now in the Oracle!

A player, 27 October 2026 12:34

[3D] Silk and Shadow Palace: - with Honesty: at less than 9 Honor: Does it then gain honor equal to printed Chi or does the trait overwrite it with current Chi?

A player, 27 October 2026 12:36

- with Strength of the Divine: Can the trait be used to give the personality +2 Chi instead of +2 PH

A player, 27 October 2026 12:41

Imperial was active player gets first shot

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 October 2026 12:41 · in reply

1. Printed Chi. The Stronghold only substitutes "Chi" for "PH". Nothing alters the preceding "printed" adjective.

2. No, giving a bonus to a stat is not "checking" it. The Stronghold can however have it check Chi for the MA.

A player, 27 October 2026 12:42

it was not uncommon to have "start a duel and murder them" in non-dueling decks in imperial.

A player, 27 October 2026 13:05 · in reply

[3D] Just to be 300% sure. If I target my courtier with Storm Heart, the Stronghold's trait would be useless since my personality is not a magistrate, right?

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 27 October 2026 13:09 · in reply

Correct.

A player, 27 October 2026 13:10

Thanks!

A player, 27 October 2026 13:12

https://klipy.com/gifs/the-road-to-el-dorado-both

A player, 27 October 2026 13:12

Looks at Bayushi Jurobei