Oracle of the Void #rules

August 2021

Messages from the Oracle of the Void #rules Discord channel, copied for Oracle of the Void. Players' names are left out; the rules officials are named. Rulings are as they stood on these dates; later rulings and the rulebooks may differ.

A player, 12 August 2021 19:11
[attachment: unknown.png]
A player, 12 August 2021 19:11

Kosaten Shiro says that a holding's gold cost cannot be changed in any other way...

A player, 12 August 2021 19:12
[attachment: unknown.png]
A player, 12 August 2021 19:12

Fantastic garden's costs less for Crane.

A player, 12 August 2021 19:13

Does Kosaten Shiro's restriction prevent crane from getting the reduced Gold Costs?

A player, 12 August 2021 19:14

Some of the other venerable masters might be better sources but no

A player, 12 August 2021 19:15

It's not reducing the cost. It's cost is 5 for crane players. Not a reduction

A player, 12 August 2021 19:15

So 4 hold with the shiro stronghold ๐Ÿ‘

A player, 12 August 2021 19:54

Hmmm...

A player, 12 August 2021 19:55

Same question with Gold edition Fantastic Gardens but has slightly different wording.

A player, 12 August 2021 19:55
[attachment: unknown.png]
A player, 12 August 2021 19:55
[attachment: unknown.png]
A player, 12 August 2021 20:00

I still believe it works. Not sure on the technical wording but the gold cost is already listed as variable on the card itself would be my best logic

saaam (not official), 12 August 2021 22:54

It would cost 5G for Kosaten Shiro players.

saaam (not official), 12 August 2021 22:54

Since the SH effect kicks in, applies the discount from 7 to 5, then negates the card's own further discount.

A player, 12 August 2021 23:00

I'll defer to the master ๐Ÿ’ฏ

saaam (not official), 12 August 2021 23:18

That's not me, but going on how things were played back then.

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 13 August 2021 01:13 · in reply

I agree with the second part, that Kosaten Shiro wouldn't allow you to get a further discount from the Holding's own trait, but it only reduces by 1, not 2, so FG would cost 6.

saaam (not official), 13 August 2021 04:01

Oh, yeah, my bad. I was trying to say the SH effect overrode the individual card effect. Should've stuck with it like that.

saaam (not official), 13 August 2021 04:06

Poorly Placed Gardens work, in general, way better than Fantastic Gardens.

A player, 13 August 2021 04:10

I remember being at the release for that set and being so stoked for the shiro for my Crane deck lol! Oh those were the days. ๐Ÿ˜‚

A player, 13 August 2021 04:24

Lots of people complained about fantastic gardens not working well for Crane players during the time that card was out

A player, 13 August 2021 04:25

(6G was the answer at the time of the MRP version)

A player, 13 August 2021 04:26

At least when it came out initially you could roll large farm and silk works so it was by itself worth it (prior to the nix)

A player, 13 August 2021 04:27

And 1 koku the rest of the holdings essentially

A player, 28 August 2021 17:54

Hey!

A player, 28 August 2021 17:55

https://images.oracleofthevoid.com/l5r/7c/f8/printing_1593_2_details.jpg

A player, 28 August 2021 17:55

https://images.oracleofthevoid.com/l5r/ed/21/printing_5224_1_details.jpg

A player, 28 August 2021 17:56

Is Moneylender considered a "gold-producing holding" for the purposes of Crystal Mine?

saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 18:22

In the context of Diamond, yes.

saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 18:22
[attachment: printing_5224_2_details.png]
saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 18:23

Since you could remove 0 tokens to produce 0 Gold, it would be a Gold-producing holding at all times.

saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 18:24

The EE printing should still count, I suppose. Since it produces Gold normally, and you're not bowing it explicitly to produce Gold, given the new minimum token removal clause.

saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 18:25

Also, pro tipยฎ๏ธ, it's really neat to add the set name in brackets after the card name in the SnM decklists, so that you play with the specific set/era printings consistently.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 August 2021 19:15

i think it works as you wrote ๐Ÿ™‚

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 August 2021 19:17

also pro tip part 2 - you don't need to edit decklist manually, if you want to display specific printing of card you just need to know where it was printed. eg if you choose Bend Like a Reed and "TotV" (time of the void) from expansions acronym list ("set name" filter in deckbuilder), SnM will show you specific printing AND its name with expansions acronym in brackets. you just need to click it and Snm will add it to your decklist ans save it with its acronym as well.

[attachment: unknown.png]
saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 19:27

Also also, note that there are a few cards missing from the DB, and sometimes the image packs.

saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 19:27

Especially older sets.

saaam (not official), 28 August 2021 19:28

I think from around Gold onward it's pretty good and consistent/complete. Clan Wars/Jade has a bunch.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 August 2021 19:32

i know. there're some holes in database, eg there are missing clan war saga reprints.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 August 2021 19:33

this database origin is from egg of pan'ku program. and there were always two versions - current edition and legacy. probably someone updating legacy accidentally used "replace" option to remove some cards.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 August 2021 19:34

Few years ago i was updating this database (since samurai till end) and was sending all corrected versions to Drew. But i stopped at some point.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 28 August 2021 19:37

anyway i think it should be in (link) channel ๐Ÿ˜‰