Oracle of the Void #l5r

October 2024

Messages from the Oracle of the Void #l5r Discord channel, copied for Oracle of the Void. Players' names are left out; the rules officials are named. Rulings are as they stood on these dates; later rulings and the rulebooks may differ.

A player, 1 October 2024 11:09 · in reply

in chrome, there is an extension called webp to png

A player, 1 October 2024 11:09

you right click on the webp, and it will say 'save as png'

A player, 2 October 2024 04:25 · in reply

Thanks for that! That extension is going to be very useful. I had to use it to convert a Naga mon that I dug up. Man, the L5R CCG really disrespected the Naga after I quit playing/collecting. Back in the early days, they were actually a popular deck to play amongst my friends.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 2 October 2024 06:20

L5R in its history had 16 playable factions/clans + those provided by specific Stronghold (like Hare or Imperial). Supporting them together could be a design nightmare. And nobody would like to gain only 1-2 Personalities or faction/theme specific cards per 3 months becasue of expansion's size restriction.

PS. Naga/Akasha was going to replace Mantis in Onyx. And that was an excellent decision. Sadly it didn't happen because of IP sale.

[attachment: image.png]
kempy_nezumi (not official), 2 October 2024 06:21
[attachment: image.png]
A player, 2 October 2024 07:38 · in reply

That actually worked well with the clan war arc, remarkably. Ironically, it saves on bloat. Each core edition set has the available factions, then expansions 'expand' on that arc's core. Super business model that would work as a hyrbid to an lcg and ccg. which, funny enough, clan war arc was.

You identify a certain set of cards as fixed for each faction, and then the rest are random.

"shrugs"

Expansions are for customization and expansion of the arc

A player, 2 October 2024 07:40

the issue is the wash and repeat of the story design, and the horrible story choices that were made

kempy_nezumi (not official), 2 October 2024 10:15

It still doesnt change a fact that too many factions at same point makes less options for every clan and what FFG LCG model proved meta is slowly progressing and boring. With low influx of new cards in internet era everything is solved too fast.

A player, 2 October 2024 10:27

In my opinon, the clan war arc went over the bloat line as far as the number of factions were concerned. I liked the original 6 clans, plus Scorpion for the power houses. I think the Naga and Shadowlands factions were needed. I really didn't have much enthusiasm for Toturi and Yoritomo armies, and wish that some of the things they did with the monks would have been used to make the original clans more interesting.

A player, 2 October 2024 10:54

It feels to me that ninja as a clan was unnecessary and thematically inappropriate, since they were supposed to be hidden inside the clans. Support cards would have been more interesting.

Ratlings, although my favorite, didn't need it, either. Again, support cards for a side story would be fantastic.

Mantis would have been much more impressive if Yoritomo had actually saved the country and then got wiped out to a soldier. That would've absolutely proven the necessity of man in an unarguable way, and made the Kolat / Gozoku much stronger. Instead, they really needed to make Yoritomo himself a mary sue in power and skill.

Spirits... bwahahahaha.

A player, 2 October 2024 11:01

I think for side characters, creating a clan makes them much more dilute. Like, the Ox clan was handled almost perfectly. A Ronin from the Unicorn was impressive enough to go back, then left, then became Kolat, then got a clan. And all of that with only temporary clan alignment that didn't interfere with the rest of the Unicorn. Morito didn't need a clan stronghold.

Same thing for The Daini. Removing the Naga clan would've had no negative, but it showed a singular evolution, and could've encouraged Dragon or Toturi players to include more Naga, if he had been written to be the personality version of a mini stronghold.

The crab were so desperate for allies, they did have ratlings as scouts, so a stronghold for the crab that gave some discount to nonhumans makes sense. Or for the Dragon and zokujin and wyrm riders. Kind of like what they did with the Lion and kitsu.

A player, 2 October 2024 11:05

Although let me also say this is all with the benefit of hindsight, and also ignores the zeitgeist of design at the time. You have to forget that you constantly had to bring in new-shinies to keep people attracted. It was the card game version of roleplaying power creep.

It was the same era where MtG started taking a six magic color seriously to maintain interest, and according to rumor, that was only stopped because it was pointed out the card backs would need changed, and they had decided in Arabian Nights that wouldn't work. If card sleeves were more commonplace and weren't banned from tournaments back then, there's probably be purple magic.

A player, 2 October 2024 13:46 · in reply

VTES has 30.

A player, 2 October 2024 13:50

Wait, more. I forgot about the Bloodlines and Hunter Fsctions.

A player, 2 October 2024 13:50

VtES doesn't require that you declare an allegience at the beginning of the game, unless you are playing advanced rules, which aren't even demanded at tournaments. Even then, you can have two.

A player, 2 October 2024 13:51

Fair

A player, 2 October 2024 13:51

By which I mean, there's no inherent benefit or penalty to playing all Tzimisce or Tremere, the only real clans.

A player, 2 October 2024 13:52

Until I send you a Letter from Vienna.

A player, 2 October 2024 13:55

:baro_sus:

A player, 2 October 2024 13:56

That's the kind of thing that gets your flesh rewritten.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 2 October 2024 15:07

Also VTES had no rotation so cardpool was still increasing. L5R had blocks and resets every 2 years. So early edition divided into 15+ factions could lead to really, really limited choices (if any).

A player, 2 October 2024 20:21 · in reply

FFG LCG died due to game length over anything else. Not nearly proof that the meta was boring and slowly progressing and honestly if they had stuck to the original release schedule it would have been approx the same number of new cards introduced over the same relative period (~150/3months). The model would have worked if the gameplay was ~20 - 30 minutes faster

A player, 2 October 2024 20:23

FFG's president resigning during its early stages didn't help either as it killed supply chain management, ect as Asmodee tried to cut costs.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 3 October 2024 04:43

LCG cycle is 120 cards per 6 packs (so 7-9 months). Whole FFG L5R LCG got less than 2000 unique cards through its lifetime (2017-2021). It's at least twice slower than in CCG standards.

Also let's not forget that LCGs had such color restriction while deckbuilding that really limits some options.

A player, 3 October 2024 23:15

I wouldve liked to have seen how the game wouldve went if you could use whatever cards you wanted without the influence limit. Same with the elemental roles. Probably tweak it so you pay more fate for out of clan cards. then the other tweak would be to the honor dial/draw cards stuff. I don't know what.

A player, 3 October 2024 23:23

That's the Thing Though. From what I know, L5R was supposed to be like, one arc and then done from the start. you had a few years to get all the cards you could. Then, the system would be altered a bit, and make a new setting.

So, for what it was, the Model AEG Created worked for what it was supposed to be. Like everything else, it got fucked.

saaam (not official), 3 October 2024 23:57

Yeah, it was initially supposed to end after the Second Day of Thunder, so after Time of the Void.

saaam (not official), 3 October 2024 23:58

Time of the Void was like two years in.

A player, 4 October 2024 01:43

so in essence, l5r was supposed to be part LCG, part CCG, and part TCG

A player, 4 October 2024 01:50

(before any of those terms had been invented)

A player, 4 October 2024 02:08

well, ccg was a thing with mtg.

A player, 4 October 2024 02:09

lcg definitely wasn't. i don't know about tcg

A player, 4 October 2024 02:16

TCG is a term coined by Wizards to describe MTG.

saaam (not official), 4 October 2024 02:33

L5R was a CCG from the beginning, because it had rarities, and you had to buy boxes of it to get playsets, and usually shit sorting for rares. 😄

A player, 4 October 2024 02:37

TCG was an attempt to find a way to lock down other games with a copyright, and they got only a partial injunction on some IP concepts, I believe. You can't copyright the rules of any game.

A player, 4 October 2024 15:18 · in reply

You can see this too in Legend of the Burning Sands, especially in the way the game took the concept of Provinces and turned them into City Sections.

Too bad LBS was beaten up pretty badly by Rolling Thunder.

A player, 4 October 2024 15:36 · in reply

The original deployment strategy was to go to a biweekly release after the first 3 cycles to make for a ~150 card pool (6 packs + 1 Clan Pack) every 3 months, in line with the CCG experience with the added 1 - 2 big boxes a year. This was trashed for a number of reasons but had things gone according to plan I think it would have been a lot more familiar.

By all means they did everything to keep the feel but make something new. I think had the game been faster it would have been MUCH better received. The role locking stuff kind of sucked but I liked everything else about deck contruction. Limited Clans made balance a LOT easier

Alex Jones (rules official), 4 October 2024 15:49

Technically, I guess, it was a much better game.

Alex Jones (rules official), 4 October 2024 15:49

But it was so much less fun.

A player, 4 October 2024 15:52

It was so much less fun

kempy_nezumi (not official), 4 October 2024 16:05

Color locking was bullshit because even with it, there was no such like balance. And first 1,5 year was a total joke in term of any balance. This game was disaster that reached dead spiral really fast. One mediocre guy left to design if after two years passed was a peak of incompetence.

I really dont know what you are talking about those biweekly releases. Never heard anything about this. Its easy to check on FFG website how slow everything was released including pauses between cycles and delayed clan packs.

A player, 4 October 2024 16:07 · in reply

I was friends with their production manager for a time. When the CEO left FFG things went sideways quickly and plans that were made were quickly abandoned. And I wouldn't call Tyler mediocre, a bit inexperienced but far from mediocre.

A player, 4 October 2024 16:11

I think they had some excellent ideas, and tried to respect the original design. It was just so long. so so long. Role locking was suppose to be to help encourage storyline involvement and it was a unique thing to do but I think really fell flat overall. It was an admirable attempt. But if L5R had been released today I doubt it would be well received. The CCG is a longer game as well, its why only the top cuts went best of 3

A player, 4 October 2024 16:13

Try to keep in mind this team was working desperately to keep the IP truly alive after it floundered for years at AEG. Tried to breath new life into it because they too loved it

A player, 4 October 2024 16:15

Look at the tournament numbers alone and it tells how poorly L5R was being received at the end. Those kotei numbers were Jade/Gold/Diamond edition casual tournament numbers. and Ivory/20F was about as well received as FFG's L5R towards its end

kempy_nezumi (not official), 4 October 2024 18:47 · in reply

I don't care. FFG was stupid enough to buy this IP with hope to get easy money. They totally fucked up.

Today, as as a fan of L5R CCG as a game i think that could be even better if AEG would shut down game in 2015 than selling it to other party. It could open some fan projects in 2015 - but this 2 years long hiatus followed by LCG hype killed whole momentum of interest in CCG version.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 4 October 2024 18:48 · in reply

That was problem with AEG. If ("if") Zinser was sincere with his stories about what happened in 2015, it's just clear that they completely screwed with 20F launch.

saaam (not official), 4 October 2024 18:54

Yeah, definitely agree on that one. Better to kill it, than try to Reboot it like it's a Hollywood movie.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 4 October 2024 18:54 · in reply

"I think they had some excellent ideas, and tried to respect the original design. " - sorry, but i can't take this statement seriously. They killed everything what was fun in CCG (or everything that was told to them is a "problem") and fit it together into modified AGOT'ish frame.

We all know that there were many ideas how to make LCG in early days but when FFG was put to the wall they decided to rush up improvised "agot'ish" system that would mimic CCG (two deck, lol) with hope that launch advertising money will cover all those holes. They were wrong.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 4 October 2024 18:57

I am so burned out with this LCG stuff. Wrote thousand of words about my expectations, feelings and disappointments in the past (ffg forums, ccg forums, bgg, fb etc.).

A player, 4 October 2024 23:10

I actually feel that an LCG needs more factions, not less. Have your core, then add to it 1 or 2 at a time. If your game mechanics are balanced, then you don't need to do more than add 1 or 2 cards that favor the older factions with each realease.

I could design l5r as an lcg with my eyes closed.

During core release, you treat it like the core book of a novel series. 4 expansions, each symbolic of a ring. 2 new factions/clans intro'd. a couple of cards for each of the already existent core factions. Fifth expansion symbolizes void ring is there to update personalities and push along core story in a major way. 4 more expansions that update the previous 4 expansions. Fifth expansion pushes story as a whole forward again.

And I really feel the reasoning for L5R CCG floundering for years, was that aeg&wotc didn't buy into the Age of Man completely. They jumped the shark too quickly by shoving the already existing BBEGs (Kolat and Lying Darkness/Nothing) into the forefront, while making a couple of other story choices that made absolutely no sense.

A player, 4 October 2024 23:11

like literally, a bunch of ronin and minor clans just saved the empire. Age of man should have focused on the rise of power of the unaligned and minor clans/unaligned factions.

A player, 4 October 2024 23:41

The Kolat were the architects of the age of man... And Yoritomo was a mistake narratively. The entire alliance being wiped out while letting the Thunders win would've been more impacting to the society view of ronin, something Toturi couldn't do. "Literally all these people we shunned were killed to save us and can still see Sickle Boy's body surrounded by oni we should stop being dicks to them" would be much much better than: "I'm going to prove men are as good as the Kami clans even though the majority of those clans were also powerful men, and I'm going to prove my point by forcing myself into being the very thing I think sucks, and then take it even further by literally becoming the thing I said sucks, and screwing the entirety of the universe in the process"

A player, 4 October 2024 23:44

I know I'm on record of not liking the Mantis, but Yoritomo himself is a lot of my issue. He's such a Gary sue and doesn't really seem to fit well. And even for his noble "as an alliance we can prove we're just as good as them" is immediately hamstrung by his willingness to bully and murder people into following his ideas. It turns into "we don't need the kami to bully us when I can do just of good a job!"

A player, 5 October 2024 02:24

I like Yoritomo as a concept, but yes. He should have had a glorious death or been taken off screen by some unknown event. After he and Ryosei got married and had a kid (rather than Moshi Wakiza). That would have tied two of the oldest canon Minor Clans together into a major clan, and given them more legitimacy in my mind.

Another bad choice was the Exile of the Scorpion. It seemed like an executive decision to push a new product tie-in, moreso than anything else, rather than letting said product stand on its own. The whole "blame scorpion" thing for the hidden emperor seems just too... shallow. You'd literally have to be mentally deficient to think that the Scorpion would be so sloppy and messy, and that it wasn't a frame up.

from there, the dominos fall

This though, along with the whole Lying Darkness steal the emperor thing immediately after the fall of Fu Leng seems to be calling alot of Canon into question.

A player, 7 October 2024 16:13 · in reply

The trends tell a different story. Kotei participation was dwindling, stores were dropping the product left and right. I remember in ~2012-2013 taking a road trip and hitting dozens of gaming stores. 90% had all their l5r in their discount bins included newly released product. Look at the kotei participation numbers, gencon numbers, fan sites still running at that time. Ivory edition was the first nail in the coffin as it alienated a LOT of their core audience. Hell AEG was basically giving away 20F at the end at their GenCon booth because they couldn't sell it at MSRP.

Additionally the claim that the 2 year hiatus killed the whole momentum, did you see the launch numbers? Tournament numbers? Crushed the numbers that AEG got, so that's a tough pill to swallow for me as there is no data to support it. Just sounds like an angry fan doing angry assumptions.

And where did you get the information FFG acquired the IP for easy money and not in good faith. Some big claims you make.

A player, 7 October 2024 16:16

If FFG had been the monster you claim they are, the Onyx Lives project would have been killed years ago. They definitely would have the legal grounds to shut it down. But the fan projects continues.

A player, 7 October 2024 16:21 · in reply

Also did you play the GOT LCG... You'd be just as accurate saying that they cloned the Star Wars LCG for L5R. There are some keywords they reused but VERY VERY different games

A player, 7 October 2024 16:28

and Im curious in your opinion what mechanics that were fun that they killed?

A player, 7 October 2024 16:32

One of the things I miss most about l5r was the ridiculous bounties and backroom deals

A player, 7 October 2024 16:34

reading up on some of the old ones, we all got wild back in the day. Mantis and their gallons and gallons of booze, handmade custom pieces, signed pop culture items. I have a DVD of Shaolin Soccer signed by Eric Devlin (Brand manager at the time) that was part of some bounty. Thats when the community really rallied I feel like.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 7 October 2024 16:48 · in reply

"Additionally the claim that the 2 year hiatus killed the whole momentum"

I am talking about interest in CCG version. People didnt continue any fan CCG activity because of IP sale and hope there's new good game incoming.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 7 October 2024 16:52 · in reply

" I remember in ~2012-2013 taking a road trip and hitting dozens of gaming stores. 90% had all their l5r in their discount bins included newly released product. Look at the kotei participation numbers, gencon numbers, fan sites still running at that time. Ivory edition was the first nail in the coffin as it alienated a LOT of their core audience. Hell AEG was basically giving away 20F at the end at their GenCon booth because they couldn't sell it at MSRP. "

Have you read Zinser's explanation what happened with Twenty Festivals distribution chain and promotion?

Anyway, even if weak, 20F Kotei season numbers were bigger than year later, in Ivory Arc environment.

A player, 7 October 2024 16:58 · in reply

Thank you for that clarification. That makes more sense to me now

kempy_nezumi (not official), 7 October 2024 17:01

"and Im curious in your opinion what mechanics that were fun that they killed?"

- winner takes it all (battles) - tempo of losing provinces (reducing resources) that forces to (re)action - maximum hand size that makes game more tactical as you may count all options in reasonable range - big final battles with plenty of stuff in play - 75% of card pool is "neutral" and everyone may use it and experiment - military and honor (sometimes also dishonor) are 100% viable mechanics since day 1 of every edition. it also includes multiple combinations like honor/dishonor/military switches that are much easier to build and play.

Whole game was built on different ideas (tempo is crucial) and that was "complete" game that could be modified from time to time (slight changes in some mechanics) while core game is same since 1995.

A player, 7 October 2024 17:11 · in reply

I have not, after Celestial (basically start of Emperor) the player base died so much on most of the East Coast of the US it became hard to find playgroups. The distribution numbers show a sharp decrease starting with Emperor and by Ivory it was a bargain bin game. There's a reason so many distributors at the start of COVID had mountains of product from Later Celestial Edition on. Any promotion and distro chain issues that were had were just the icing on the cake honestly. The massive rules overhaul of Ivory is what stopped my playgroup from restarting (oddly enough in 20F). While I believe Distro and promo issues happened, the company as a whole wasn't doing amazing and was already shifting its priorities heavily to board games and much less on to l5r. Im sure Zinser blames promo and distro but the reality is they changed priorities as a company

A player, 7 October 2024 17:12

I appreciate you taking the time to type this all out though. Its nice to see opposing and different view points.

A player, 7 October 2024 21:18 · in reply

Do you have that explanation handy somewhere?

A player, 7 October 2024 21:25

https://www.reddit.com/r/rpg/comments/3sal4v/talking_tabletop_john_zinser_on_the_sale_of_l5r/

[From the rpg community on Reddit]
A player, 7 October 2024 21:25

that might be some of it

A player, 7 October 2024 21:26

https://kolatinformant.wordpress.com/2023/02/19/how-the-end-of-the-l5r-ccg-came-to-be/

[How the end of the L5R CCG came to be]
A player, 7 October 2024 21:26

you may know about most of that tho

A player, 7 October 2024 21:27

Thank you!

A player, 7 October 2024 21:31

who was Brand Manager before Dave Laderoute

Brook Cunningham (rules official), 7 October 2024 21:33

Nicolas Bongiu is listed as the Brand Manager in the Ivory Rulebook I have coincidentally handy. Pretty sure it was Todd Rowland before that.

A player, 7 October 2024 21:35 · in reply

I hadn't read that yet but I had seen a few of the bits and pieces, nice to see it all in one place. Appreciate the clarity throughout that Zinser did the right thing at the end for his company (and de facto his employees).

A player, 7 October 2024 21:37

(and AEG has continued to be a quality brand.)

A player, 7 October 2024 21:42

Where do you think the IP goes from here?

Rumors of a rebooted CCG are abound. So if there is a CCG reboot, using the AEG L5R ruleset (Likely Ivory core rules but my personal preference would be something earlier.) but using their new timeline: would you play it?

A player, 7 October 2024 22:44

That summary is essentially correct. Some of those newer employees weren't acting as a team, communication was horrid. The IA lapsed because there were at least 3 different visions for an online version of it, and nobody could give me a straight answer on what they wanted (they expected me to code it). From what I could see there was clearly infighting/disagreements going on in some of those folk, which caused some deadlock.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:46

(I did produce at least one version of an online herald... which immediately got: "That's not what I wanted... it should be like this MTG site over here!" from an employee who hitherto hadn't participated in any of the discussion, so it got scrapped.)

A player, 7 October 2024 22:47

It was.. very frustrating.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:47

Then they hired the greek guys to do it.. but clearly didn't give them anything better... as those guys were trying to rewrite the oracle...

A player, 7 October 2024 22:49

And when they did get something... it was an emergency and I had to pull back-to-back all-nighters to hammer what they had into something deployable.. since they apparently hadn't been passed the stuff I produced about integrating with the oracle.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:50

that's a shame. some of stuff i did see online seemed basic but ok from an informational stand point for imperial assembly.

i never went to gencon. so most of the info i saw was from what I could find online/facebook or what people would share with me during local koteis. Ivory and 20f was kind of blah for me as a player. I liked that you could draft l5r, but the player base by me was more into constructed than draft as they could showcase their love for their clan better that way.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:51 · in reply

If it was a full reboot and there were local players, I'd definitely give it a try. I'm friends with the developers for VTES 5E and I really wish it had a stronger Modern format because whoever owns VTM these days has made so many changes to the setting, I don't want to even attempt to reconcile the two at a table.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:52

probably it was well known that their version of doomtown had a limited lifespan but ill be honest that I just opted to never buy another aeg game after i got the news about reloaded ending. I probably wasnt their target market anyway.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:52

I bought a bunch of 20F from Hills for funsies and it was enjoyable, but did not grab my friends.

A player, 7 October 2024 22:53

(somehow I never got into L5R when it was in print)

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 05:43 · in reply

No.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 05:53

L5R should be in hand of 100% L5R focused company, like Legend Studio is for Flesh and Blood.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 05:54

https://legendstory.com/about

[Legend Story Studios]
A player, 8 October 2024 08:29 · in reply

No. CCGs are a massive waste of paper and ink. For a playset in L5R, you had to buy one or two boxes of boosters and ended up with literally hundreds of useless common cards. Rares were not very difficult to get (except exceptions obviously). I never understood why it didn't turn into a LCG earlier

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 08:37

FFG LCG is also crap system. Theres also plenty of useless cards you must pay for as theres no secondary market. Clan/Factions loyalists in FFGish LCGs are bored to dead with low number of new cards. FLGS hate LCGs as they must be superb specific during ordering as theres no way to sell older packs (no sense for redraft as prizes like in CCG).

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 08:44

Doomtown LCG makes thing better as you may play every card everywhere and experiment with many deck types out of various factions/outfits.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 08:47

But as vibrant competetive game LCGs are hard to maintain. Doomtown is an example of niche card game with slow release system that fits to its specific kitchen table audience.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 08:49

I know nothing about new 7th Sea game but i think its also niche casual stuff.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 09:00 · in reply

Who the hell buys playsets in CCGs except collectors? Most people i know were sharing boxes for clans specific stuff. Tribalism was strong in L5R and it helped a lot for deckbuilding in healthy local environment.

A player, 8 October 2024 09:03

✋

Alex Jones (rules official), 8 October 2024 09:11

I did.

Alex Jones (rules official), 8 October 2024 09:13

Much cheaper when you get two copies of every card, but I generally managed to get playsets of everything even before I was on the Rules Team.

A player, 8 October 2024 09:13

usually with one box, you had all the common and half of the unco three times

Alex Jones (rules official), 8 October 2024 09:15

Yes. For an expansion, three boxes would get you a playset of most of the rares.

Alex Jones (rules official), 8 October 2024 09:15

You needed a lot more for the base set, obvs.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 09:36

In my local environment (around 20 players in Samurai era peak) nobody cared about playsets except Personalities and some clan specific/helpful cards. Personally i was trying to get playsets of C/UC and my clan(s) rares. After so many years i dont have any booster expansion in playset.

A player, 8 October 2024 14:55

My chief complaint about LCGs is that Drafting is the most fun way to Crack packs and also the easiest way to level the playing field for new players, and it is 100% against the LCG model. I'd much rather a CCG where Rares were cards that were sprinkled into decks a handful at a time.

kempy_nezumi (not official), 8 October 2024 16:16

btw here's quote from Zinser dated 2021. There was his vision for AEG L5R LCG hybrid version.

"John Zinser Eric Steiger the biggest hurdle with the LCG model from the business side is selling enough cards to make it profitable. There is a world where you can charge a premium but not ridiculous price to avoid booster packs. If you sell faction packs for a 8 faction game it means you are likely selling 1/8 of what you would sell of a normal LCG release. In my hybrid idea you would charge a premium for the faction packs and then in boosters you could go back to having multiple levels of rarity and super rare super valuable cards that would drive pack sales but not be detrimental to being able to play the game competitively. For boosters to work you would need to put some new cards in them just doing shiny versions of cards they can get in the LCG style packs is a non starter."

Alex Jones (rules official), 8 October 2024 17:01

That sounds a bit like Coils of Madness

A player, 8 October 2024 17:36

Wouldn't suprise me if CoM was testing out that busines model

A player, 9 October 2024 20:15 · in reply

This is actually the correct answer. Hell, iirc, the first L5R CCG store was fan created.

L5R was LCG enough to maintain a story, but ccg enough to not restrict alot of cards outside of limited tournaments

A player, 9 October 2024 20:27

as for how decks & packs should be distributed: Every Clan/Faction deck sold should have a limited number of fixed cards, with the rest being gated random (gated random meaning random selection from a pool of useful cards for said/faction clan). Booster packs should be tied to each one of the elements, weighted for that element, but still random: Earth Boosters would be weighted toward holdings and regions, fire would be weighted toward items, air would be spells and strategies, water would be personalities and followers. each of these would also be randomized, with leanings toward the stated type. Void would be complete lottery, but a set distribution type like 1 rare, 3 uncommons, 6 commons.

A player, 9 October 2024 20:31

I also still feel like alot of the reason the ccg died had to do with stupid story decisions and mechanics. the story went off the rail so many times, with some of the mechanics being cool, and others doing nothing more than adding bookkeeping for no reason.

A player, 24 October 2024 09:45 · in reply

I completely agree with you. The LCG took over the external appearances of the CCG (the two decks, the four provinces...), but in a totally artificial way. All the game mechanics that gave L5R its so particular epic breath have completely disappeared in the LCG.

In short, despite appearances, the LCG and the CCG had strictly nothing to do with each other.

And not only did the LCG no longer have anything to do with the CCG, but it was also a very bad game (sluggish, slow, unnecessarily complicated in its implementation without having any real strategic depth) distributed in a very bad format (few cards available, including very few really useful ones, so an environment that changes very slowly - too slowly -, impossibility for new players to integrate the game unless they bought everything from the beginning - while it was much easier to take a CCG on the way...).

I loved L5R CCG (at least until Twenty Festival and Ivory) for 15 years, then tried to convince myself that L5R LCG was still good (since it was L5R!) for a year, before finally realizing that L5R LCG is to L5R CCG what The Rings of Power is to The Lord of the Rings.

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:25

I'll also argue that the original CCG took away a ton of what made the CCG fun over time, in trying to simplify the rules to draw in new players. Comparing the first 2-3 years of the game's rules with the last 2-3 years' worth, it's vastly different. And a watered down, bland experience trying to copy MtG in every way.

A player, 24 October 2024 16:33

That's a really good comparison. The rings of power and Lord of the rings...

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:34

Yeah. Like, I get it. Much bigger market, different demographics, it's no longer the Wild 90s CCG Days®, but... it just ended up feeling cheap and unimaginative.

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:34

It really did get treated like that. The art direction became fantastic, and the simplified gameplay made it sound better/more enjoyable, but... it kinda lost its soul.

A player, 24 October 2024 16:48

There is a weird balance to be struck between easily digestible rules and deep meaningful gameplay. Not every game can be Go.

A player, 24 October 2024 16:55

Also, people are less likely to invest an hour or more into a single game of a ccg than they were in the '90s

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:56

True. That being said, the CCG _was_ sometimes very clumpy on time. You could have ten minute games most of the time, and then against specific opponents, it'll go to time, every time.

A player, 24 October 2024 16:56

I never in my life have had a 10-minute l5r game... Maybe I'm in the minority there

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:57

I've had SO many.

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:57

Some of the best L5R games I've had were under five minutes.

A player, 24 October 2024 16:57

That's like three turns how?

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 16:57

We'd be able to tell who was going to win by turn three, and then either call it, or decide to play out the next turn or two to see if one can magically eek out a win.

A player, 24 October 2024 17:00

Oh okay. But if you'd played it out, it would have been 30 minutes probably. Which 30 - 45 minutes was the average time for an L5R game

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 17:02

Nah.

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 17:02

A good Open Honour deck would win T4 or T5 like 90% of the time if it was going to win.

A player, 24 October 2024 17:02

K. Not going to argue 😂 there are countless tournament results that support the 30 to 45 minute average time. I don't know a soul that would sweep after three turns in a tournament

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 17:02

Made for really efficient games.

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 17:03

Right. That's what I mean, though. I can go have five games where they're <10 minutes long, and then two games against control/dishonour that would each take 70 minutes, so the average gets way skewed.

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 17:04

This also doesn't include the games where you or your opponent would gold-screw, and without G&F or related, you'd just get stomped in four turns.

A player, 24 October 2024 18:37

Have any of y'all played Vampire: the Eternal Struggle? If not you should check it out

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 18:37

Like, 20 years ago.

A player, 24 October 2024 18:37

1 dead CCG is enough for me

saaam (not official), 24 October 2024 18:38

I'm a big fan of the OG Rage CCG (not the AEG Rolling Thunder, Rage Across Last Vegas flavour).

A player, 24 October 2024 18:39 · in reply

It is not dead atleast in EU...there was EClast month in Poland havin 150 players or something and last year Barcelona EC there was 260 players

A player, 24 October 2024 18:56 · in reply
[attachment: image0.gif]
A player, 24 October 2024 18:58

V:TES has been back in print for a few years. New releases haven't been as fast paced as they used to be, but the current design team understands the assignment really well.

A player, 24 October 2024 18:58

Https://www.blackchantry.com

A player, 24 October 2024 18:59

If you're looking for something that's mechanically deep like L5R used to be, it might be worth checking out.

A player, 24 October 2024 19:00

https://discord.gg/vampire-the-eternal-struggle-official-887471681277399091

A player, 24 October 2024 19:18

I was big into VTES for a while. With all the changes to Fifth Edition, I'm not sure I want to play an all-sets game anymore.

A player, 24 October 2024 19:19

2 licensed games for the same IP that fill the same niche. And this is why VtM's ownership keeps changing hands 😂

A player, 24 October 2024 19:20

It does seem like Paradox hands that license out like candy

A player, 24 October 2024 19:21

It's too bad White wolf couldn't keep it going. I completely understand why they sold but man did they make a great product originally.

A player, 24 October 2024 19:28 · in reply

All of the old stuff is still legal, outside of a short ban list. Much of the new stuff is worth getting too.

A player, 24 October 2024 19:30

Yeah. I know. It's trying to use Setites and Ministers (for example) at the same time that I find jarring.

A player, 24 October 2024 20:01

That'd be challenging to do, given how the grouping rule works, but I don't want to drag this channel further off topic.

A player, 24 October 2024 20:01

Just wanted to shill for a game I love