This ruling seems to contradict an earlier question's answer about the same card.
Is the most recent ruling correct, and should the previous one be ignored?
Re: Inferno's Tooth
A topic from AEG's L5R CCG Rules forum, copied for Oracle of the Void from a copy of the forum saved in October 2015, so pages it didn't save are missing. Players' names are left out; the rules officials are named. Rulings are as they stood on these dates; later rulings, the rulebooks and the Rules Archive may differ.
This ruling seems to contradict an earlier question's answer about the same card.
Is the most recent ruling correct, and should the previous one be ignored?
Don't know what I was thinking there. Though the old ruling was before Samurai Edition came out. Fixed.